12-17-2003 02:33 PM
Hi.
In my corporate network i have configured a PIX 520 firewall with the vpn configuration, so, when i get connected through dial-up connnection there is no problem,
but i have a DSL connection, with a DSL router, the router ethernet interfase has the ip address 192.168.1.1 and my PC the ip address 192.168.1.3 is mandatory that i must have a public ip address for my PC with VPN client software???,
because i have problems, and the message displayed by the software is: "Secure VPN connection terminated locally by the client Reason: The remote peer is no longer responding",
is there any problem with NAT (in the network of my DSL provider? i need a static mapping to a public ip address?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
thanks for help me.
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-24-2003 11:08 PM
if you have pix fw v6.3.x, nat/pat is not going to cause any problem, it will auto negotiate UDP-encap.
thx
Afaq
12-24-2003 11:08 PM
if you have pix fw v6.3.x, nat/pat is not going to cause any problem, it will auto negotiate UDP-encap.
thx
Afaq
12-25-2003 08:42 AM
do you have "isakmp nat-traversal" in your config on the pix? do you have udp encapsulation checked off on the client
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide