11-15-2017 06:01 AM - edited 07-05-2021 07:52 AM
Hi all,
as per technote, if we want to configure LAG, 2820i is compatible with few cisco models only (3850/3650) etc.
Why is that so, isnt LAG = LACP?
11-15-2017 07:57 AM - edited 11-15-2017 08:09 AM
Kinda is. Let's say it is a subset of real Link Aggregation as it does not allow you to select mode.
-If I helped you somehow, please, rate it as useful.-
11-15-2017 09:54 AM
If the only issue is mode, it should still be compatible with 2960x series ? or any other 3rd party switch supporting LACP?
11-15-2017 09:58 AM
If you setup the switch to mode on, this should work.
-If I helped you somehow, please, rate it as useful.-
11-15-2017 10:36 AM
My confusion is, 2960x and 3650/3850 supports LACP. What does 3650/3850 supports in term of LAG that 2960x doesnt ?
11-16-2017 05:46 AM
Hi,
LAG with 3rd party switches has not been tested. AP uses same IP address but different source port to do the balancing, so the switch should be able to do load balancing based on UDP port information. For more information on LAG with 3rd party switch please refer to bug CSCvf77787.
Please refer:
https://techzone.cisco.com/t5/Access-Points/LAG-on-1800-2800-3800-AP/ta-p/1007165
**************** Please rate Useful posts********************
11-19-2017 08:52 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide