10-24-2011 10:23 AM - edited 07-03-2021 08:58 PM
I believe that I understand the difference between 2.4 and 5 GHZ when it comes to designing coverage to a location. I would like to know if anyone ever setup a conference room with 25 laptop’s where there is a greater concentration of device in a smaller area. Not sure on which model will support this type of environment.
Thanks
Ralph
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-26-2011 11:22 AM
Ralph:
My apologies. I typo'ed the post. I meant the 1142. The 1242 has antennae and is dark blue/gray.
The 1142's are white and have no antennae.
The 1242's are good too. Cheaper, but they aren't as pretty.
Looking at the list price, you save about $100 per AP going with the 1242.
If you go with the 3502i, you're gonna pay about $500 more per AP.
3502i's give you a lot more if you utilize the "CleanAir" Technology (self-healing, self-optimizing, etc)
If you're starting from scratch, your due dilligence should also include researching other vendors too.
I know we were approached by Aerohive. The product was great. The pricepoint was cheaper. But the overall cost of replacement would have been astronomical because we were already in bed with Cisco for 70+ APs and 4 controllers.
Just something to consider.
Ven
10-24-2011 12:08 PM
The major differences between the two are the type of frequencies (channels) they offer and the Wi-Fi protocols they support.
The 2.4GHz band offers 3 non overlapping channels and supports 802.11 b/g/n.
The 5GHz band offers at least 23 non overlapping channels and supports 802.11a/n.
The 2.4GHz band covers a larger range than 5GHz and is commonly used throughout the US in consumer products such as PC’s, PDA, Bluetooth Devices, cordless phones, and microwaves. 2.4GHz can occasionally experience interference from these devices when the same frequency (channel) is used. 5GHz on the other hand has a shorter range but because it offers numerous non over lapping channels it’s not as susceptible to interference.
However, because of its shorter range it does not penetrate solid objects nearly as well as 2.4GHz and limits its reach. This can be resolved by adding more access points when using 5Ghz.
Taking into consideration that you're looking to have a dense client distribution in a small area, I would definitely recommend two AP's.
I'd recommend the 1242's because they're available in standalone or lightweight. They have a low-profile design that makes them nice for conference rooms (no antennae) and they support 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz.
Granted, you can do this for significantly cheaper using non-cisco AP's, but this is a Cisco forum.
If you're thinking of going with a controller-based solution in the future, I'd really recommend the 1142's.
Ven
10-24-2011 03:05 PM
Ven, Leo
Thank you very much in responding to my question. I have to go off site tomorrow for a project so I won't be able to responded back to you until Wednesday. I just wanted to say thank you as I believe that I am on the same page but I didn't know enough about the different models of AP. I will look into 1242, 1142 or 1140 and comment back to you guys.
Regards
Ralph Staiano
10-26-2011 10:57 AM
Ven
I like this AP as I believe if I'm understanding this correctly, that it uses dual band access point which allows for high capacity / security / enterprise feature where as the other AP 1242G uses the standard single band.
Is this the AP that you were referring to?
Ralph
10-26-2011 11:22 AM
Ralph:
My apologies. I typo'ed the post. I meant the 1142. The 1242 has antennae and is dark blue/gray.
The 1142's are white and have no antennae.
The 1242's are good too. Cheaper, but they aren't as pretty.
Looking at the list price, you save about $100 per AP going with the 1242.
If you go with the 3502i, you're gonna pay about $500 more per AP.
3502i's give you a lot more if you utilize the "CleanAir" Technology (self-healing, self-optimizing, etc)
If you're starting from scratch, your due dilligence should also include researching other vendors too.
I know we were approached by Aerohive. The product was great. The pricepoint was cheaper. But the overall cost of replacement would have been astronomical because we were already in bed with Cisco for 70+ APs and 4 controllers.
Just something to consider.
Ven
10-26-2011 05:54 PM
Ven
Thank you very much in taking the time in helping me make a decision.
Regards
Ralph Staiano
10-24-2011 02:20 PM
Depends on what is your budget. You can start with an 1140, as Ven has recommended, or you can go to a 3502i.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide