03-26-2014 10:23 PM - edited 07-05-2021 12:33 AM
Hello,
i have 2 wism on each 6500 series box, i got t my network pre configured . last week one of the AP started malfunctioing anyways it was under smartcare support so i got replacement from cisco now i want to delete the old AP and add this new one
could anyone tell me what are the steps to achive this ??
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-27-2014 03:50 AM
hmmm :)
Ok here is the process:
The AP sends CAPWAP discovery messages to discover the controllers, and each controller responds with a CAPWAP discovery response message. After a list of potential controllers is built, the AP chooses to join one of the discovered controllers using the following order of preference:
1. Primary controller: The AP will associate first with its primary controller, assuming the AP has been primed.
2. Upon failing with the primary, the AP will try to register with its secondary and then its tertiary (if configured).
3. If no controller information is primed in the AP, or if the primary, secondary, and tertiary controllers cannot be reached,
the AP then looks for a master controller. The master controller is a feature you configure on a controller (from Controller > Advanced > Master Controller Mode ). Its purpose is precisely to offer a collection point for APs that cannot join their
primary, secondary, or tertiary controller.
4. Finally, if the AP cannot discover a primed controller or a master controller, the AP will select the least loaded from all controllers that have responded to the discovery. Least loaded is relative to the controller license. In that sense, a 2106
controller with 4 APs is more loaded than a WiSM with 30 APs.
5. If no controller can be discovered, the AP reboots and restarts the discovery process.
Hope thsi clarify.
Regards
Dont forget to rate helpful posts
03-27-2014 04:03 AM
Thnaks for your brief reply.
1 there is no Master Controller Mode is enabled.
2- there is no pimary, secondary or tertiary is confgired. (not sure)
each controller has 65,66,67,65 APs connected repectively.
lets say if AP XX is connected to controller A can i forcefully move it to controller B or C??
03-27-2014 04:32 AM
Yes you can.
By changing the primary and secondary controller config on specific AP.
Wireless > Access Points > All APs > Select AP > High Availability Configuration and put the ip and wlc name as primaty wlc to which you want to join AP.
More info here.
http://rscciew.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/ap-failover/
regards
Dont forget to rate all helpful posts
03-27-2014 04:39 AM
i have checked my 4 controllers and all APs have same config means some of them have primary A and secondary C controller and some of them have primary D and secondary E.
what i understand is whenever i will connect any new AP it will be connected to controller A and once its assciotaed than i can move it to another controller
am i right?
03-27-2014 04:42 AM
Yes you can move it.
Just configure the primary WLC ip(On which you want to move this AP) and name in High availbility section.
Regards
Dont forget to rate all helpful posts and also mark this question answered, it may help others.
03-27-2014 04:44 AM
Thanks sandeep for your time and support
03-27-2014 04:45 AM
Just my 2¢
When you remove an access point or if the AP is no longer joined to a WLC, it will not have an entry in the access point list. If you manually added a mac filter, then you manually have to remove it.
As far as AP join, etc. If your brining AP's up, its best to either have master controller enabled or use one of the ap join methods that Sandeep has posted. Make AP's join only one WLC so you can decide how you will assign AP's to what WLC. This way, all new AP's will just join one. If you don't have any of these methods, then its up to the AP which WLC it wants to join.
When the AP has joined, then you should assign the AP to a WL:C.... this should be done on the AP under High Availbility, which Sandeep has posted. Now you can assing which WLC is the primary, secondary, etc.
This is how it should be done, you should have sites connected on the same WLC and not have them mixed.... not best practice. That is what is called a salt n pepper design and causes more inter conroller roaming which is not needed.
Example:
WLC1
Site A, B, C
WLC2
Site D,E
WLC3
Site F,G,H
WLC4
Site I,J,K,L
What you want to try to do is balance the number of AP's from a given site to a WLC if you can. or you can just place sites that are in a region to a WLC.
03-27-2014 04:55 AM
Thnks Scott for more information just a quick question if i enable Master Controller Mode on WLC A will it be any service impact on the network i dont want any down time
03-27-2014 04:59 AM
No there will be no impact.
03-27-2014 05:10 AM
No it will not be, but I only enable master or any of the other options when I need to join an AP to a WLC. Master helps you, because you now only have to look at one WLC to find any new access points. As long as the master WLC is responding to the AP, that AP will join the master.
You do still need a mechanism for the AP's to find the WLC, but you probably already have that in place. Again, this would only point to the master.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide