Is it possible to lower the power draw on the Aironet 1552e AP (AIR-CAP1552E-N-K9)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2013 01:07 AM - edited 07-03-2021 11:46 PM
Hello,
Is it possible to lower the power draw on the Aironet 1552e AP (AIR-CAP1552E-N-K9) so it will run on a standard PoE device (IEEE 802.3af). The spec sheet for the AP says you need to either use the Cisco PoE injector (AIR-PWRINJ1500-2=).
Is there possibly a firmware upgrade/downgrade or some sort of command I can use?
The APs being used are running LWAPP and require a controller.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
-Fox
- Labels:
-
Aironet Access Points

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2013 03:29 AM
No there is no way to change the power draw of an AP
Steve
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2013 04:46 AM
Steve is right!!!!! It specifically states in the data sheet the powering options for these APs and also states that 802.af will not power up the radios.
*** Please rate helpful posts ***
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2015 02:56 PM
for what it is worth, this is partially incorrect. I was mistakenly shipped an LWAP version of the 1552E at first, and when powered via a POE af switch, it booted right up, but the terminal output during startup specifically mentioned that it was disabling the secondary gigE port because of low POE. Now I have an autonomous 1552E and am trying to find out how to make it act the same way.
Unfortunately I am not having any luck, and as you mentioned, all the documentation explicitly states that Cisco's POE injector is to be used. How annoying. Defeats the purpose of POE.
