08-29-2012 03:39 AM - edited 07-03-2021 10:35 PM
Hello
My organization is planning to implement wireless solution. We will have 40 APs.
i want wireless traffic not to go through controller . Can i use hreap to accomplish this? or is there any other solution?
If i use only one controller to manage this APs, what will happen if controller breaks down? will the wireless lan continue to work without controller? or do i need second conttroler ?
Thanks in Advance
12-29-2012 06:52 AM
hi,
there is no need to purchase other wlc for this you think right hreap is better option which would locly switch the wireless traffic,
thanks
satyendra
12-30-2012 12:05 AM
a quick answer would be, it depends on your deployment.
If users in remote offices need a radius server to authenticate to (if you use EAP/802.1x, i.e. WPA/WPA2 Enterprise) then you either need to make the traffic go to the controller OR install radius server in every remote office.
If you use something like WPA-PSK then APs can work fine if the connection to the controller lost.
This was a quick answer.
For more detailed answer I think you need to go to read the HREAP deployment guide. You'll find answers to most of your questions.
Here is the link: http://tiny.cc/0wd4pw
HTH
Amjad
Rating useful replies is more useful than saying "Thank you"
12-31-2012 02:53 PM
To add to this, once the control plane to WLC is lost only existing clients would continue being serviced till the time they doesnt auth timeout.
That means authentication timeout and/or session timeout will kick them off the network.
Also 40 Aps is a pretty decent sized deployment, i think you should go for a redundant controller.
Regards
Sahil
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide