10-18-2010 12:15 AM
Hi,
I am having a Cisco ACE 4710 (c4710ace-mz.A3_2_0.bin).
I have two SMTP Servers that are load balanced with VIP Address. It is a single arm configuration. (Predictor = Round Robin)
My issue is that, client is complaining that ACE is not doing a proper load balancing among two servers. Because, one server is receiving arround 500 emails while other is getting the 10 - 15 emails at the same time.
I have checked the "show serverfarm SFARM1 detail" command and found that the counter increments for the connections on both servers are increasing one by one which seems that it is fine.
But, client is expecting that emails receiving ratio should be in equal proportion 1:1. Is it possible?
Please comment or any idea...
--
Kind Regards,
Mubasher
10-18-2010 01:04 AM
The loadbalancer loadbalances connections not emails.
So, if the connections are splitted equally ACE is doing its job right.
Nothing else you can do.
Gilles.
10-18-2010 01:17 AM
Hi Gilles,
Thanks for the reply,
This is correct that what you mentioned but i was thinking to changed the predictor to "least connections" because the customer was complaining that one server is exhausted with no. of emails (500 emails) and became down one time.
I want to make some tests and clarify the situation that ACE is working fine. Please advise that shall I change predictor to “least Conn” and can it be done online or does require any disconnection or downtime?
Any other idea or suggestion...
B. Regrds,
Mubasher
10-18-2010 01:30 AM
You can give a try to leastconn.
The change can be done live. No downtime required.
Gilles.
10-18-2010 06:03 AM
05-11-2012 08:24 AM
One thing I found was under policy map
policy-map multi-match VLAN10
class VS-ETmail
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM-Mail
loadbalance vip icmp-reply
nat dynamic 1 vlan 10
Also do you have multiple service-policies in your configuratin if so you can also add
policy-map multi-match "name"-vip Note: make sure you add -vip to the policy-map name.
Also with RR Cisco ACE LB will work in one of two ways
1. Per-Packet:
2. Per-Destination: Most apps use this method
You can also setup capture statments to the rservers to get better understanding of packet flow.
Have you also tried another route: TCP Least connections., etc....HTH
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide