06-07-2016 06:50 PM
Dear Rober,
My customer asked a wired question about 16000~16005 ports opened on REMB.
they are asking why REMB opend 5 ports on REMB rather than 4, 6 or even more?
and whehter REMB will use 16000~16005 to handle one call.
based on REM documentation, i knew REMB stars up 5 processes for UDP multiplexing processing.
i think 5 ports design is based on redundancy and robust consideration. if one process is dead unexpectedly, it will not affect total performance.
and for one call process, REMB just will multiplex one port to handle it.
please let me know whehter my understanding is correct.
and comment on this silly question.
yours
Alan
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-08-2016 02:51 AM
Hi Alan,
You are correct:
If you did allocate more ports it would need to be done in multiples of 5 so each process has the same number of ports available.
I hope this helps,
Rob
06-08-2016 02:51 AM
Hi Alan,
You are correct:
If you did allocate more ports it would need to be done in multiples of 5 so each process has the same number of ports available.
I hope this helps,
Rob
06-08-2016 03:27 AM
thanks Rob.
would more ports be helpful to REMB performance?
for instance, we increase to 10 ports from 16000~16009.
yours
alan
06-08-2016 05:13 AM
Hi Alan,
We haven't performance tested with more that 5 ports for a long time.
You may get some benefits allocating 10 ports if you have spare cores available.
More that 10 ports will probably not provide any further advantage.
Regards,
Rob
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide