Cisco Bug Discussions

Are there any checks or verifications known to see if ISE was not infiltrated by someone using log4j?

I have the same problem, may I ask which command to view the information

Is there a file I can check on the UCCE Nodes that confirms that the ES91 patch fixes the issue and Log4j version is 2.16.0?  Also the Release notes say AW, Router, Logger, PG,  and Admin Client. Does Cisco mean for Agent PG's and VRU PG's?

Any workaround or new solution to this bug?

I have found this bug report that says this issue was resolved in 12.8.2.X but I have 1 user that has noticed this issue in the latest version. I did not find a bug report for this issue and the 12.9.0 version. Should this version be added to this bu...

Hi, I was wondering if only version 6.8.1.0 is affected by log4shell or also other, earlier versions? ThanksMathea 

CIMC Version 3-0-3f. Installation of ISE 2.7 using Virtual Media. Constantly keep getting message Virtual media disconnected midway through the installation. As per the bug workaround, I have tried using Firefox but I'm running into the same issues. ...

Our informacast version 12.13.2 - 23 Purchased licenseThe info in the TAC mentions cisco pagng server version effected is 12.5 Are we good.  the version listed appears to be similar to the other cisco products version.  

We just replaced an older cisco switch 3600 and copied with a 9200 , using the same config as the existing one and left the MTU size on the new swithc at default of 1500. A number of hours later they started to have issues with the network and lost t...

To avoid below  warning WARNING: The specified zoneset has 4 zone(s) with more members than the recommended limit (50) Zoneset activation initiated. check zone status. ------------ fcalias name xxx_xxx_hosts vsan 10 member device-alias xxx-xxx-xx ini...

after applying the patch, we had an issue with cmx. long story short, had to run cmxos stop -a then cmxos start -a to get things working again.

Is Identity Services Engine version 2.4.0.357 aslo affected by this vulnerability as it is not mentioned specifically on Cisco's Security Advisory page?Thank you.