05-22-2020 12:30 PM
I have been using
my thoughts and feedback of CML
Would love to hear from Cisco on my experience
on the positive side
It doesn't seem to require nearly as much CPU and RAM as VIRL
It's a pretty design. I like not having to use maestro
05-22-2020 12:47 PM
@cslefort wrote:
on the positive side
It doesn't seem to require nearly as much CPU and RAM as VIRL
Do you have any stats to share?
My biggest concern is the CPU and RAM requirements .. for these images.
I can run appr. 40 IOU nodes in Eve-NG with 8 GB RAM 4 Core CPU.
Would love to see if Cisco can give us something similar .. I would like to use CML due to API support compared to Eve-NG. But CPU and RAM requirements are a downer for me.
Thanks for sharing your feedback.
05-22-2020 01:42 PM
I shutdown my CML, so can’t check
virl was running 4 xrv9k and 14 csr1000v. Was chewing 20 cpu and about 150gigs of ram
The xrv9k are hogs
cml was a small fraction of virl
05-22-2020 04:25 PM
Agreed,
So buggy at even a basic level.....I prefer packet tracer over this hot mess! Good luck finding any support, as cisco sends you in a web loop when searching for it.
05-22-2020 04:26 PM
05-23-2020 04:48 PM
Rebooted CML again.
had to license again
i can now deploy 20 nodes
consoles appear to be working for all devices via breakout
06-12-2020 01:31 PM
I think I too am giving up on CML. I spent 2 weeks in license h3ll, then after all that got straightened out, I started getting Not Ready Errors. Go in and reset the whole thing back to defaults, worked for a couple of hours, then right back to Not Ready Errors.
Downloaded new VM and ISO, allocated 6 cores (on an I7) gave it 26gigs of RAM and expanded the hard drive to 32gigs....and the same error is happening on both VMs.
I think there are other options that are better than CML at better price points. $199 is a bit pricey for a piece of software that is this unreliable. I think it is a good idea, but, not yet ready for prime time.
07-31-2020 06:58 AM
07-31-2020 07:03 AM
08-03-2020 12:31 PM
"the CML CSR1v image won’t accept tagged frames. This is very basic functionality that should have been tested"
Thanks for mentioning this, I was trying to find out why nothing seemed to work with these images. This is so stupid, why is this working with the small IOSv images but not with the CSR1ks?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide