cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
15685
Views
100
Helpful
35
Replies

CMS 1000 VM resource allocation question

danny.yf_li
Level 1
Level 1

Hi all

 

     Cisco document says that CMS1000 support up tp 96HD calls. My client purchased a CMS1000

and a SMP+ license for CMS. How should I edit the CMS vm  (vCPU, vRAm...) which was preloaded on CMS1000 in order to support 96HD calls? I can't find any document talking about this.

 

Thanks!

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

The VM specs for a CMS 1000 are what I explained:

2 sockets * 35 cores per socket = 70 vCPU (BTW, check your math)

58 GB of vRAM

 

Those are the specs the VM that came preloaded should have had.

2vCPU left for ESXi

6 GB left for ESXi and VM overhead.

HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

View solution in original post

35 Replies 35

Jaime Valencia
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

The CMS 1000 should already ship with the required specs in the VM so you just turn it on, load the licenses and configure it.

HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

Patrick Sparkman
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni
CMS 1000 comes preconfigured from the factory and already supports 96 HD ports when it ships.

Thanks Java and patrick

 

      I checked the preloaded CMS VM . The VM was given 8vCPU and 16GB RAM.

According to Cisco CMS VM resource allocation

https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/virtualization/virtualization-cisco-meeting-server.html#notes

, 1vCPU = 1.25HD port. So 8vCPU=10.24 HD ports

How to calculate 96HD ports with 8vCPU and 16GB RAM. This is a bit confusing to me.

 

Thanks guys

Danny

Hi Danny,

 

if it's showing you 8vCPUs, something is not quite right.

Have you activated your VMWare license?

It seems that they're shipping with the defaults as if you use the OVA from cisco.com (8 vCPU / 16 GB vRAM), just had a call with a partner that got two CMS 1K with the same thing.

The ESXi license was the right one on their boxes

 

OP, do the following, shut down the VM, upgrade the VM HW version

Then adjust the specs as follows:

2 sockets * 35 cores per socket

58 GB vRAM

 

Also reach out to your SE and let them know you also got a box with the wrong VM specs on the CMS 1K so the BU is aware, and they try to track this issue.

HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

Hi Java,

 

      Thanks again for your comment. I have deployed 3 CMS1K so far. All of them came with 8vCPU, 100GB Harddisk  and 16GB RAM. The VM specification didn't change automatically even all licenses were applied (Including Vsphere combined key for 2CPUs CMS activation key and call license. eg pmp+ smp+ and CMSCU)

 

       The VM cannot be set as 2 sockets * 35 cores per socket but 2 sockets with at most 16 cores per socket

Thats makes the CMS1000 VM has Max 32 vCPUs. I did tune the virtual socket and cores per socket setting. The result were the same. The max CPU for CMS is limited to 32 vCPUs. This does make me confused. According to CMS Virtual machine deployment guideline provided by Cisco, such spec will not meet the requirement for 96HD concurrent calls.

   Thanks!Untitled.pngUntitled2.png

VM version shows 8, did you upgrade the VM HW as I mentioned in my previous post??????

And the vRAM is also WRONG, it should be 58 GB, not 64. The server comes with 64 GB of RAM, if you choose 64, there's nothing left for the VM overhead and ESXi.

HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

Hi Java

 

     I have just updated the VM from version 8.0 to 11.0.The vCPUs can now be set as 2 sockets and 3235 cores per socket. That makes it 7270 vCPUs (By the way,72 70x1.25=9087.5 HDports not 96HD ports). However I still have a question about the RAM. Cisco says that the RAM requirement is 

4+ GB(1 per physical core). How should I interpret that requirement.cms.png

Thank you very much for your help!

The VM specs for a CMS 1000 are what I explained:

2 sockets * 35 cores per socket = 70 vCPU (BTW, check your math)

58 GB of vRAM

 

Those are the specs the VM that came preloaded should have had.

2vCPU left for ESXi

6 GB left for ESXi and VM overhead.

HTH

java

if this helps, please rate

Thank you Java

 

    Sorry for my bad Math. ;-p .You did help me alot. I am still curious how to calculate 96HD ports if 1 vCPU=1.25 HD ports. Whatever, if 70vCPU and 58GB RAM can support 96HD ports, that is totally okay.

Danny

Since CMS1k is dedicated to CMS (and should not be running anything else, besides ESXi), the calculations on the Virtualization Wiki do not apply to it.

With the correct setup, it can handle the number of calls described in documentation.

 

If you look closer to the Virtualization Wiki, it does say that the tables do not apply to some hardware (like CMS1k). This is because the Virtualization Wiki assumes co-residence with other VMs.

Hey Danny,

 

This is because you're currently running VM version 8 which only supports 32vCPUs. You'll want to upgrade the VM hardware by right clicking on the VM and hitting Upgrade Virtual Hardware. Once you've done this you'll be able to configure the VM with 2 sockets with 35 cores each.

 

50_1.png

 

Please let me know if you have any further comments, questions, issues, or concerns.

 

Kind regards,

Ben Andrews

Hi guy,

your procedure is valid also for CMS 1000?

My customer want add more vCPU but initial OVA that i provide was for CMS 1000.

 

Thanks

Hey Jaime,

Look what Cisco suggest to do when going to deploy vmware based machine.

Go to "Cisco Meeting Server 2.0+ Installation Guide for Cisco Meeting Server 1000 and Virtualized Deployments" page 12.

"

7. From the Getting Started tab, select Edit Virtual Machine settings and CPUs.
a. Edit VM settings and choose CPUs. Set Number of Virtual Sockets to 1.
b. Set Number of Cores per Socket to one of the following:
* On a dual processor host with hyperthreading, set Number of Cores per Socket to the
number of logical cores minus 2.
"

So it seems like Cisco suggest to set vm with 1:68 instead of your recommendation 2:35

 

Please explain the difference

Thanks

 

For the record when I look at the ova parameters for the vm as Cisco defined on CMS 1000, I see that it looks as your suggestion.

But I still don't understand the difference between the guide.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: