02-28-2022 08:53 AM
I have two top of rack N9Ks, in addition to ToR layer 2 duty these are BGP peering with NSX-T, each with a single Edge. Trying to troubleshoot a BGP flapping issue and captures at the NSX end are showing unanswered ARP requests.
ethanalyzer local interface inband capture-filter "host 192.168.100.105" limit-captured-frames 100
On one ToR this works exactly as expected and I see BGP keepalives, BFD etc. all looks well. On the other it fails to see the locally destined traffic - despite BGP / BFD connections being up, for some reason ethanalyzer doesn't see the frames. Same exact config except the IP addresses, same NX-OS version...so I'm stumped - anyone know the internal workings of Ethanalyzer and why these two switches could be behaving differently?
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-28-2022 09:45 PM
Have you tried using "display-filter ip.addr==192.168.100.105" instead of the capture-filter?
Cheers,
Sergiu
02-28-2022 09:45 PM
Have you tried using "display-filter ip.addr==192.168.100.105" instead of the capture-filter?
Cheers,
Sergiu
03-01-2022 02:28 PM
Thanks, I get to see what I needed. Don't understand why display works while capture doesn't but anyhow...
11-18-2022 06:40 AM
Hi @sjhwilkes ,
I see you are interested in learning more about Ethanalyzer. I encourage anyone wants to learn more about Ethanalyzer to watch this video made by a colleague mind. This is a video walk-through of how to use the Ethanalyzer capture tool on Nexus series switches.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1toLt9G_V1Q
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide