cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1587
Views
30
Helpful
3
Replies

Nexus 9000 Ethanalyzer behavior - missing packets

sjhwilkes
Level 1
Level 1

I have two top of rack N9Ks, in addition to ToR layer 2 duty these are BGP peering with NSX-T, each with a single Edge. Trying to troubleshoot a BGP flapping issue and captures at the NSX end are showing unanswered ARP requests.


ethanalyzer local interface inband capture-filter "host 192.168.100.105" limit-captured-frames 100

 

On one ToR this works exactly as expected and I see BGP keepalives, BFD etc. all looks well. On the other it fails to see the locally destined traffic - despite BGP / BFD connections being up, for some reason ethanalyzer doesn't see the frames. Same exact config except the IP addresses, same NX-OS version...so I'm stumped - anyone know the internal workings of Ethanalyzer and why these two switches could be behaving differently?

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Sergiu.Daniluk
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Have you tried using "display-filter ip.addr==192.168.100.105" instead of the capture-filter?

 

Cheers,

Sergiu

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

Sergiu.Daniluk
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Have you tried using "display-filter ip.addr==192.168.100.105" instead of the capture-filter?

 

Cheers,

Sergiu

Thanks, I get to see what I needed.  Don't understand why display works while capture doesn't but anyhow...

Darian O'Dirling - TCE
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi @sjhwilkes ,

I see you are interested in learning more about Ethanalyzer. I encourage anyone wants to learn more about Ethanalyzer to watch this video made by a colleague mind. This is a video walk-through of how to use the Ethanalyzer capture tool on Nexus series switches.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1toLt9G_V1Q


Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card