11-28-2010 10:25 AM - edited 03-16-2019 02:09 AM
Hi
How do i enable it so that if an internal user at DN 1234, want to call 2345, but are entering the full 0 + 8 digit dial string, does not go through the GW.
( we are using 4 digit for internal calls, 8 for external + 0 )
Some of the internal users are entering the full dial string, as if they where to call local extension.
I want the Translation Pattern ( i think ), to be set up so that if an internal caller, want to dial another internal user, and he is entering 0 + 8 digit, then my CUCM should strip some digits of, and see that this is meant to be an call from internal to internal users.
I know that this should be possible. We are using 4 CSS. Int, Norm, Foreign and All.
Any advice here.
/alf
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-28-2010 11:16 AM
You are correct that you need to use translation patterns.
Create a new translation pattern in the same partition as your phone directory numbers.
For each DID range that you have enter the full number that a user would dial to reach the phones including the 8 access code and XXXX for the last four digits.
Assign a Calling Search space that allows the translation pattern access to the partition containing the phone directory numbers.
Enter XXXX as the Called Party Transformation Mask
The image below shows a translation pattern configured on CUCM 7 configured as described above - CCM4 should be similar.
11-28-2010 11:16 AM
You are correct that you need to use translation patterns.
Create a new translation pattern in the same partition as your phone directory numbers.
For each DID range that you have enter the full number that a user would dial to reach the phones including the 8 access code and XXXX for the last four digits.
Assign a Calling Search space that allows the translation pattern access to the partition containing the phone directory numbers.
Enter XXXX as the Called Party Transformation Mask
The image below shows a translation pattern configured on CUCM 7 configured as described above - CCM4 should be similar.
11-28-2010 01:07 PM
Hi
Thanks, that seems to be working quite well. Have not run a full test, but tested with my Communicator, but it looks OK.
DNA shows this, and i am reading that to be OK. OR?
Regards
/alf
11-28-2010 03:37 PM
Hi Alf,
It looks ok to me.
Thanks for the nice rating
James
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide