Does anyone know of a table like this for all Cisco phones?
I started putting such a table together but it's turning out to be a lot of work. And a lot of the current phones don't have EOX dates, so I would need to watch for updates somehow.
And I know about the URL
but that is only one-at-a-time, and I usually have a list of 10 - 20 to check. A table I could put into Excel would make life much easier for me.
The most important value is End Of Support. Compatibility with 11.5 and 12 would probably be next.
Model | Release Date: | End-of-Sale Date: | End-of-Support Date: | Works with CUCM 11.5 | Works with CUCM 12 |
Cisco Unified IP Phone 8941 | February 23, 2011 | May 31, 2014 | May 31, 2019 | yes | yes |
Cisco Unified IP Phone 8945 | February 23, 2011 | March 31, 2016 | March 31, 2021 | yes | yes |
Cisco Unified IP Phone 8961 | November 6, 2009 | July 9, 2015 | July 31, 2020 | yes | yes |
Cisco Unified IP Phone 9951 | November 6, 2009 | July 5, 2016 | July 31, 2021 | ||
Cisco Unified IP Phone 9971 | November 6, 2009 | July 5, 2016 | July 31, 2021 | ||
Cisco Unified IP Phone 521SG | August 11, 2008 | April 30, 2010 | May 1, 2015 | ||
Cisco Unified IP Phone 524SG | August 11, 2008 | April 30, 2010 | May 1, 2015 | ||
Cisco Unified Wireless IP Phone 7920 Multi-Charger | March 3, 2006 | June 8, 2007 | June 8, 2009 | ||
Cisco Unified Wireless IP Phone 7925G-EX | November 6, 2009 | October 15, 2016 | October 31, 2019 |
Did you find an EOL EOS table? That's exactly what I'm looking for. I want to know if any of our phones need to be replaced because of End of Support, or because of a CUCM upgrade. I bet there is a way to query for this with APIs. Maybe you have figured it out already.
No, I looked and looked, and never found a table for End of Life, End of Support, etc., only individual pages for each phone, or model group.
If you find one, please post to this thread. I could still use a list like that. Looking up each individual phone is quite tedious.
Hi Phig/Gretchen,
I was looking at each of the phone EOL status and prepared a similar table recently to check compatibility for CUCM versions 12.x & 14.x. As per Cisco's initial announcement, any phones which are EOL are not supported in CUCM 14.x but later they also announced that they have extended that deadline. But still the EOL info in the below table holds good. Hope this will be useful.
Device | EOL status | CUCM 12.x | CUCM 14.x |
Cisco 6921 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 6941 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 6945 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7902 | EoL | Deprecated | Deprecated |
Cisco 7911 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7925 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7935 | EoL | Deprecated | Deprecated |
Cisco 7936 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7937 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7940 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7941G-GE | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7942 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7945 | 30-Jun-23 | ||
Cisco 7960 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7961 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7961G-GE | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7962 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco 7965 | 30-Jun-23 | ||
Cisco 7970 | EoL | Deprecated | Deprecated |
Cisco 7971 | EoL | Deprecated | Deprecated |
Cisco 7975 | 30-Jun-23 | ||
Cisco ATA 186 | EoL | Deprecated | |
Cisco ATA 187 | EoL | Deprecated |
HTH
Rajan
Please rate all useful posts by clicking the star below and mark solutions as accepted wherever applicable
Rajan. That is definitely something I need, too. I created that same type of table a couple of years ago, but I don't even think CUCM 14 was out back then, but I need a new one, so yeah, this is nice. Thank you Rajan.
For the End of Support (and other) dates, I'm trying to figure out how to pull them from the Cisco API. I have Postman and SoapUI installed, trying to figure out the token it is asking for. If I can get a list of phone models, maybe I can build a table in a couple hours with the API.
Maybe I need to see if Cisco has an API forum ... Do they call it DevNet now?
Don't bother with the APIs for EOX. The EOX information is Fort Knox, under lock and key. I spent hours trying to figure out how to do APIs, installed Postman, watched numerous Youtube videos, and guess what, NOPE, you have to be a Smartnet or PSS partner to have access to this info publicly available on the web, but oh no, not the APIs. Pretty furious about all the wasted time, and how everything is under lock and key.
Thanks. I had started to go down that same road and put a day into it when I saw your post. We are a partner. I don't know who our approver is, but I'm sure the answer is going to be no, so I aborted. A whole day wasted. I wonder why this API is locked down and what the big deal is. An API reply takes much less than a web page. They could just limit the rate. I'm a little tired of this stuff Cisco.