05-10-2018 08:22 AM - edited 03-01-2019 03:17 PM
We have MPLS core with 3 Route reflectors (RR), we are implementing 6VPE in the core, we want to start testing with two PEs (running XR OS) and one RR only. To enable 6VPE on the PE, I'll add "address-family vpnv6 unicast" on the PEs, but I have few questions please
1) Under the address-family vpnv6, I'll use these commands
"update-source Loopback0
address-family vpnv6 unicast
next-hop-self"
Do we have to add IPv6 to the loopback0? Or the IPv4 is enough to make "update-source loopback0" and "next-hop-self" work? I think IPv4 is enough?
2) Can I add "address-family vpnv6 unicast" to one RR? Or I have to add it to all RRs?
Thank you in advance
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-10-2018 08:53 AM
Hi,
1) The 6VPE feature is built to run on MPLS IPv4 only core, so you do not need an IPv6 address on the Loopback interface. The next-hop-self is implicitly configured for 6VPE and is not required.
2) You could start with only one RR, but this is only for a trial.
Regards,
05-10-2018 08:53 AM
Hi,
1) The 6VPE feature is built to run on MPLS IPv4 only core, so you do not need an IPv6 address on the Loopback interface. The next-hop-self is implicitly configured for 6VPE and is not required.
2) You could start with only one RR, but this is only for a trial.
Regards,
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide