cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1966
Views
10
Helpful
4
Replies

ASR9k/XR: L3 across multiple parallel links with Static not load balance

Hi,

 

# mon int te0/4/0/0.532 te0/7/1/2.536 te0/10/1/1.534

Te0/4/0/0.532         42.7M/  0%     1.1G/ 11%   138.3T/9.0M      4481T/297.4M
Te0/7/1/2.536         46.2M/  0%   756.5M/  7%   137.3T/14.2M     1080T/160.0M

Te0/10/1/1.534        53.5M/  0%   743.9M/  7%   137.6T/12.8M    984.6T/260.7M

 

I'm checked the configurations are the same. How should I do?

 

Thank you very much.

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

My Cisco Partner told me it's a normal behaviour of Cisco hash algorithm.

 

RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CB8# sho cef ipv4 summary

  Load balancing: L4

 

Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 5.3.4[Default]

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/crs/software/crs_r4-2/addr_serv/configuration/guide/b_ipaddr_cg42crs/b_ipaddr_cg42crs_chapter_011.html#con_1250252

 

Thank you very much.

View solution in original post

4 Replies 4

smailmilak
Level 4
Level 4
Hi,

You mean static route to same destination over three links?

Please provide the routing configuration.

#sho run router static vrf FT1

Spoiler
router static
 vrf FT1
  address-family ipv4 unicast
   x.145.112.0/24 TenGigE0/4/0/0.532 10.x.133.134 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.112.0/24 TenGigE0/7/1/2.536 10.x.133.150 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.112.0/24 TenGigE0/10/1/1.534 10.x.133.142 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.113.0/24 TenGigE0/4/0/0.532 10.x.133.134 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.113.0/24 TenGigE0/7/1/2.536 10.x.133.150 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.113.0/24 TenGigE0/10/1/1.534 10.x.133.142 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.214.0/24 TenGigE0/4/0/0.532 10.x.133.134 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.214.0/24 TenGigE0/7/1/2.536 10.x.133.150 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.214.0/24 TenGigE0/10/1/1.534 10.x.133.142 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.215.0/24 TenGigE0/4/0/0.532 10.x.133.134 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.215.0/24 TenGigE0/7/1/2.536 10.x.133.150 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.215.0/24 TenGigE0/10/1/1.534 10.x.133.142 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.218.0/24 TenGigE0/4/0/0.532 10.x.133.134 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.218.0/24 TenGigE0/7/1/2.536 10.x.133.150 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
   x.145.218.0/24 TenGigE0/10/1/1.534 10.x.133.142 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3

Thank you very much.

My Cisco Partner told me it's a normal behaviour of Cisco hash algorithm.

 

RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CB8# sho cef ipv4 summary

  Load balancing: L4

 

Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 5.3.4[Default]

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/crs/software/crs_r4-2/addr_serv/configuration/guide/b_ipaddr_cg42crs/b_ipaddr_cg42crs_chapter_011.html#con_1250252

 

Thank you very much.

I see that you using interface, besides the next-hop. This is necessary for proper load balancing.

We have evenly distributed traffic over 4 links, but it's internet traffic. 

Not every traffic can be distributed evenly.

 

Your Cisco partner is right.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: