
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-08-2017 08:40 PM - edited 03-01-2019 03:14 PM
Hi,
# mon int te0/4/0/0.532 te0/7/1/2.536 te0/10/1/1.534
Te0/4/0/0.532 42.7M/ 0% 1.1G/ 11% 138.3T/9.0M 4481T/297.4M
Te0/7/1/2.536 46.2M/ 0% 756.5M/ 7% 137.3T/14.2M 1080T/160.0M
Te0/10/1/1.534 53.5M/ 0% 743.9M/ 7% 137.6T/12.8M 984.6T/260.7M
I'm checked the configurations are the same. How should I do?
Thank you very much.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
MPLS
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-11-2017 07:45 PM
My Cisco Partner told me it's a normal behaviour of Cisco hash algorithm.
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CB8# sho cef ipv4 summary
Load balancing: L4
Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 5.3.4[Default]
Thank you very much.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-08-2017 09:59 PM
You mean static route to same destination over three links?
Please provide the routing configuration.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-08-2017 11:22 PM
#sho run router static vrf FT1
vrf FT1
address-family ipv4 unicast
x.145.112.0/24 TenGigE0/4/0/0.532 10.x.133.134 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.112.0/24 TenGigE0/7/1/2.536 10.x.133.150 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.112.0/24 TenGigE0/10/1/1.534 10.x.133.142 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.113.0/24 TenGigE0/4/0/0.532 10.x.133.134 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.113.0/24 TenGigE0/7/1/2.536 10.x.133.150 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.113.0/24 TenGigE0/10/1/1.534 10.x.133.142 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.214.0/24 TenGigE0/4/0/0.532 10.x.133.134 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.214.0/24 TenGigE0/7/1/2.536 10.x.133.150 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.214.0/24 TenGigE0/10/1/1.534 10.x.133.142 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.215.0/24 TenGigE0/4/0/0.532 10.x.133.134 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.215.0/24 TenGigE0/7/1/2.536 10.x.133.150 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.215.0/24 TenGigE0/10/1/1.534 10.x.133.142 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.218.0/24 TenGigE0/4/0/0.532 10.x.133.134 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.218.0/24 TenGigE0/7/1/2.536 10.x.133.150 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
x.145.218.0/24 TenGigE0/10/1/1.534 10.x.133.142 bfd fast-detect minimum-interval 500 multiplier 3
Thank you very much.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-11-2017 07:45 PM
My Cisco Partner told me it's a normal behaviour of Cisco hash algorithm.
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:CB8# sho cef ipv4 summary
Load balancing: L4
Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 5.3.4[Default]
Thank you very much.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-11-2017 11:36 PM
I see that you using interface, besides the next-hop. This is necessary for proper load balancing.
We have evenly distributed traffic over 4 links, but it's internet traffic.
Not every traffic can be distributed evenly.
Your Cisco partner is right.
