- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-11-2017 01:03 AM - edited 03-01-2019 03:14 PM
Hi,
We need some help about network design. We have 3 mainly services:
- VPN L2 point-to-point links
- Customer type A than must use Internet link type A
- Customer type B than must use Internet link type B
So far, we have use default routing table in router to implement service 2. A vrfB to implement service 3. For service 1, we use QinQ with brigde-domains or p2p connections. Users for service 2 and 3 must not be connected between them.
Now, our network topology is going to change and we can have a redundant ring topology with 9 routers (ASR903 and ASR9006). Each node can have customers than ask for the 3 services.
We don’t like very much use MSTP as protocol responsible of implementing network redundancy. So we have been studying MPLS: LDP, EoMPLS (instead of QinQ) and OSPF as internal routing protocol (instead MST).
We think that a possible solution is:
- Use default routing table in all router to implement active MPLS and LDP, with a OSPF process with id 1 for example.
- Use vrfA to implement service 2, with a OSPF process with id 2.
- Use vrfB to implement service 2, with a OSPF process with id 2.
We suppose than perhaps we can mix in default routing table both service 1 and 2 but we don’t like it very much.
Any ideas for a goog network design?.
Thank you very much in advanced.
Regards
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
MPLS
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-11-2018 02:45 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-11-2018 02:45 PM
