06-23-2014 07:56 PM
Hi everybody
Braving sham link first time.
Please consider the following :
CE1---R1(PE)------R2(p)------R3(PE)--------CE3
R1 has a sham link to R3
R1:
R1#show running-config | section ospf
router ospf 4 vrf ZEE
log-adjacency-changes
area 1 sham-link 10.10.10.1 30.30.30.3 cost 2
network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 1
interface Loopback10
ip vrf forwarding ZEE
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.255
router bgp 1
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 1
neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ipv4
neighbor 3.3.3.3 activate
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 3.3.3.3 activate
neighbor 3.3.3.3 send-community extended
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf ZEE
redistribute ospf 4 vrf ZEE
no synchronization
network 10.10.10.1 mask 255.255.255.255
exit-address-family
R3;
R3#show running-config | section ospf
router ospf 2 vrf ZEE
log-adjacency-changes
area 1 sham-link 30.30.30.3 10.10.10.1 cost 2
interface Loopback30
ip vrf forwarding ZEE
ip address 30.30.30.3 255.255.255.255
end
router bgp 1
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 1
neighbor 1.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ipv4
neighbor 1.1.1.1 activate
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 1.1.1.1 activate
neighbor 1.1.1.1 send-community extended
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf ZEE
no synchronization
network 30.30.30.3 mask 255.255.255.255
exit-address-family
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I see the sham link bouncing :
*Mar 1 10:11:49.453: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 2, Nbr 16.16.16.1 on OSPF_SL0 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
R3#
*Mar 1 10:12:04.489: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 2, Nbr 16.16.16.1 on OSPF_SL0 from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: Interface down or detached
R3#
*Mar 1 10:12:29.369: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 2, Nbr 16.16.16.1 on OSPF_SL0 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
R3#
On R1:
*Mar 1 10:26:35.533: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 4, Nbr 35.35.35.3 on OSPF_SL0 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
R1#
*Mar 1 10:27:01.245: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 4, Nbr 35.35.35.3 on OSPF_SL0 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
R1#
*Mar 1 10:27:35.557: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 4, Nbr 35.35.35.3 on OSPF_SL0 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
R1#
Is it normal ? Does sham link bounce like that?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-25-2014 08:02 PM
Can you check if you're learning the loopbacks used to the sham-link via OSPF? this is not allowed.
06-26-2014 01:05 AM
Hello Sarah,
the trick with sham links is that the sham link endpoints must be published only with MP iBGP and not in OSPF in VRF.
In your case the network area command is too general and includes the loopback used for the sham link. So you need to modify the configuration of Ospf avoiding that on the PE nodes the sham addresses are advertised by OSPF in VRF.
This is the reason for what you see.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
06-25-2014 08:02 PM
Can you check if you're learning the loopbacks used to the sham-link via OSPF? this is not allowed.
06-29-2014 09:07 AM
Thanks Renan
06-26-2014 01:05 AM
Hello Sarah,
the trick with sham links is that the sham link endpoints must be published only with MP iBGP and not in OSPF in VRF.
In your case the network area command is too general and includes the loopback used for the sham link. So you need to modify the configuration of Ospf avoiding that on the PE nodes the sham addresses are advertised by OSPF in VRF.
This is the reason for what you see.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
06-29-2014 09:06 AM
Thanks Giuseppe
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide