11-20-2014 07:25 AM
I have a router with a VRF SVI that I need bound to another site with a pseudowire. The SVI is in a VRF, the LDP interface with all the bindings is in the global table. Is there a way to bleed it over to allow the VRF interface into the global LDP so it will peer? Closest thing I found was MPLS LDP-VRF-Aware Static Labels, but that seems messy and might not work in this instance.
Local interface: Vl117 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 117 up
Destination address: 172.30.10.22, VC ID: 5, VC status: down
Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: no route
No adjacency
Load Balance: none
Flow Label: Disabled
Create time: 00:39:48, last status change time: 00:39:48
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 172.30.10.22:0 up
Targeted Hello: 172.30.10.111(LDP Id) -> 172.30.10.22, LDP is DOWN, no binding
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote binding)
LDP route watch : enabled
Label/status state machine : local ready, LruRnd
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last local SSS circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local SSS circuit status sent: Not sent
Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
MPLS VC labels: local 532, remote unassigned
Group ID: local 0, remote unknown
MTU: local 1500, remote unknown
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
transit packet drops: receive 0, send 0
Long story why it is this way, but I can't change the underlying design at this time.
12-11-2014 08:57 PM
did you try using a VFI?
01-23-2017 02:32 PM
What is it that you need to accomplish please?
Connecting L3 interface in a VRF into a PW can be done with PW-HeadEnd feature.
adam
netconsultings.com
::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry::
01-11-2017 06:38 AM
I have the same problem, but I am afraid, that this is impossible:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/15_0s/mp_15_0s_book/mp_multi_vrf_vrf_lite.html
•Label distribution for a given VPN routing and forwarding (VRF) instance on a given router can be handled by either the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) or the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP), but not by both the protocols at the same time.
So, I will try only with BGP (because of tunnel label information), but I am not sure if it will work.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide