cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Bookmark
|
Subscribe
|
1417
Views
0
Helpful
9
Replies

TE Over a directly connected link

rajivrajan1
Level 3
Level 3

I am trying to build a TE over a directly connected link ( ofcourse between loopbacks) for Fast RR purposes. will it work ? doesnt seem to be coming up ...

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

nopes, i dont see any issue with that, it will work.

View solution in original post

9 Replies 9

Atif Awan
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

rajivrajan1 wrote:

I am trying to build a TE over a directly connected link ( ofcourse between loopbacks) for Fast RR purposes. will it work ? doesnt seem to be coming up ...

Can you provide configurations of both devices?

Atif

Thank for reply.

A-B-C on a triange - A-C via B is UP .. A to C directly connected TE is not coming up. All i wanted to know is is there any restriction to build a TE between two directly connected routers ?

I am assuming it may be due to lebel pop .. not sure .. just wanted to confirm..

Hi,

Can you post the output of following commands:

show mpls traffic-eng tunnels

show mpls traffic-eng tunnels brief

show ip rsvp interface


show run int "Tunnel Interfaces"


show mpls traffic-eng topology brief

here you go

Hi,

I only see one TE which is UP and valid, where ar ethe second TE configs and status ??

i am sorry .. i guess both TE tunnel configurations are shown...let me  know if you looking for a a specific command,  also.. why do we need two tunnels  for testing ?

once again the question - for my understanding  : Do you thin TE will come up if configured properly between two directly connected routers ( between loopbacks)?

nopes, i dont see any issue with that, it will work.

finally the universal command " reload " worked ..  something woth 12.2 i guess . thank you everyone for the efforts