04-05-2006 11:40 PM
Hi Expert,
I want to practise the TE over ospf virtual-link. The topo is like this one:
R1 R2
| |
R3---R4
| |
R5 R6
all links are in area 0 except link between R3 and R4.
rt5_1#ro
router ospf 1
router-id 1.1.1.1
log-adjacency-changes
network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng area 0
!
interface Tunnel16
ip unnumbered Loopback0
tunnel destination 6.6.6.6
tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
tunnel mpls traffic-eng priority 5 5
tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth 5
tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 10 dynamic
...
....
rt5_2#ro
router ospf 1
router-id 2.2.2.2
log-adjacency-changes
network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng area 0
!
....
rt5_3#ro
router ospf 1
router-id 3.3.3.3
log-adjacency-changes
area 1 virtual-link 4.4.4.4
network 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 10.10.13.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 10.10.34.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
network 10.10.35.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng area 0
mpls traffic-eng interface
Ethernet1/0/1 area 0
....
rt5_4#ro
router ospf 1
router-id 4.4.4.4
log-adjacency-changes
area 1 virtual-link 3.3.3.3
network 4.4.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 10.10.24.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 10.10.34.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
network 10.10.46.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng area 0
mpls traffic-eng interface Ethernet1/1 area 0
....
rt5_5#ro
router ospf 1
router-id 5.5.5.5
log-adjacency-changes
network 5.5.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 10.10.35.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng area 0
!
....
rt5_7#ro
router ospf 1
router-id 6.6.6.6
log-adjacency-changes
network 6.6.6.6 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 10.10.46.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng area 0
!
...
--------
The tunnel 16 on R1 from R6 does not come up .
rt5_1#sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels t16
Name: rt5_1_t16 (Tunnel16) Destination: 6.6.6.6
Status:
Admin: up Oper: down Path: not valid Signalling: Down
path option 10, type dynamic
Config Parameters:
Bandwidth: 5 kbps (Global) Priority: 5 5 Affinity: 0x0/0xFFFF
Metric Type: TE (default)
AutoRoute: enabled LockDown: disabled Loadshare: 5 bw-based
auto-bw: disabled
Shortest Unconstrained Path Info:
Path Weight: UNKNOWN
Explicit Route: UNKNOWN
History:
Tunnel:
Time since created: 1 hours, 7 minutes
Path Option 10:
Last Error: PCALC:: No path to destination, 6.6.6.6
.....
Does anyone the cause of the problem?
thanks,
04-06-2006 03:34 AM
Hello,
the tunnel is setup between two routers in area 0 (R1 and R6) and you enabled MPLS TE only in area 0:
router ospf 1
mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng area 0
So I assume the condition of your tunnel is not depending on the virtual link at all (R1-R3-R5-R6 is all area 0, right?). Have you checked RSVP settings on all relevant interfaces? Each router should be configured with at least:
ip cef
mpls traffic-eng tunnel
interface Ethernet0/0/0
!adjust to your hardware, repeat for each interface
ip address 10.10.0.1 255.255.255.0
mpls ip
mpls traffic-eng tunnels
mpls mtu 1512
ip rsvp bandwidth 7500 7500
router ospf 1
mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng area 0
Hope this helps! PLease rate all posts.
Regards, Martin
04-06-2006 05:04 AM
Hi Martin,
The topology is not so clear in my first post.
Here is the correct one:
R1 R2
| |
R3---R4
| |
R5 R6
All links are in area 0 except the link between R3-R4, which is in area1, and this area is the virtul link.
Yes, I double checked my config and every router has
rsvp and cef, and mpls traffic-eng config.
I can see the following out on every router:
rt5_3#sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels b
Signalling Summary:
LSP Tunnels Process: running
Passive LSP Listener: running
RSVP Process: running
Forwarding: enabled
thanks,
guoming
04-06-2006 05:07 AM
Hi Martin,
The double links between R1 and,R3, R3 and R5 is not correct.There is one link between R1 and R3, R3 and R5. Also there is one link between R2-R4, and R4-R6.
thanks,
guoming
04-06-2006 05:12 AM
Hello,
the topology is not clear to me. Do you have a contiguous area0 or not?
Can you post a "show mpls traffic-eng topology brief" on router R1 and R6 (if different)?
Regards, Martin
04-06-2006 06:30 AM
Hi,
There is one virutal link between R3 and R4.
rt5_1#sh mpls traffic-eng topology
....
IGP Id: 3.3.3.3, MPLS TE Id:3.3.3.3 Router Node (ospf 1 area 0)
link[0]: Broadcast, DR: 10.10.35.5, nbr_node_id:24, gen:224
frag_id 1, Intf Address:10.10.35.3
TE metric:10, IGP metric:10, attribute flags:0x0
link[1]: Broadcast, DR: 10.10.13.1, nbr_node_id:25, gen:224
frag_id 0, Intf Address:10.10.13.3
TE metric:10, IGP metric:10, attribute flags:0x0
link[2]: Broadcast, DR: 10.10.34.3, nbr_node_id:-1, gen:224
frag_id 3, Intf Address:10.10.34.3
TE metric:10, IGP metric:invalid, attribute flags:0x0
sh mpls traffic-eng topology brief
.....
IGP Id: 3.3.3.3, MPLS TE Id:3.3.3.3 Router Node (ospf 1 area 0)
link[0]: Broadcast, DR: 10.10.35.5, nbr_node_id:31, gen:106
frag_id 1, Intf Address:10.10.35.3
TE metric:10, IGP metric:10, attribute flags:0x0
link[1]: Broadcast, DR: 10.10.13.1, nbr_node_id:32, gen:106
frag_id 0, Intf Address:10.10.13.3
TE metric:10, IGP metric:10, attribute flags:0x0
link[2]: Broadcast, DR: 10.10.34.3, nbr_node_id:-1, gen:106
frag_id 3, Intf Address:10.10.34.3
TE metric:10, IGP metric:invalid, attribute flags:0x0
IGP Id: 4.4.4.4, MPLS TE Id:4.4.4.4 Router Node (ospf 1 area 0)
link[0]: Broadcast, DR: 10.10.46.6, nbr_node_id:34, gen:104
frag_id 0, Intf Address:10.10.46.4
TE metric:10, IGP metric:invalid, attribute flags:0x0
link[1]: Broadcast, DR: 10.10.24.2, nbr_node_id:19, gen:104
frag_id 1, Intf Address:10.10.24.4
TE metric:10, IGP metric:10, attribute flags:0x0
link[2]: Broadcast, DR: 10.10.34.3, nbr_node_id:-1, gen:104
frag_id 2, Intf Address:10.10.34.4
TE metric:10, IGP metric:invalid, attribute flags:0x0
IGP Id: 5.5.5.5, MPLS TE Id:5.5.5.5 Router Node (ospf 1 area 0)
link[0]: Broadcast, DR: 10.10.35.5, nbr_node_id:31, gen:94
thanks,
guoming
04-06-2006 10:36 AM
Hello,
as there is really only one virtual link between R3 and R4, then the tunnel is not depending on it. Just shut down the interface between R3 and R4 and monitor the tunnel. The tunnel should come up if everything is confiured correctly because the remaining network is all area 0.
If the tunnel does not come up with area 1 removed, then the problem has nothing to do with the virtual link at all. Do normal MPLS TE trouble shooting to achieve a working tunnel between R1 and R6. Once the tunnel is up then enable the R3-R4 interface and the OSPF virtual link again to check, whether it has any effect on your MPLS TE environment.
Hope this helps! Pllease rate all posts.
Regards, Martin
04-06-2006 08:46 PM
Although your diagram is bit unclear, I'll try the best.
have you noticed that PCALC error ?, no path to 6.6.6.6
I would chase this way;
sh ip rou 6.6.6.6
sh ip cef 6.6.6.6/24
sh mpls traffic-eng topology path destination 6.6.6.6
Then deb rsvp stuff
Regards
Sanjeewa
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide