Network Security

Engage with peers and experts on network security topics such as Secure Firewall Threat Defense, Adaptive Security Appliance, Secure Firewall Management Center, and Security Cloud Control.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

“Join

 
Labels

Forum Posts

Hi, We have just installed a FW ASA 5505 in production at datacenter and since then we have been experiencing very strange behaviour in the Network. The Network details are following:1) Inside 100 192.168.59.0/24 V-lan 1002) DMZ 50 192.168.60.0/2...

ray_stone by Level 1
  • 432 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Hiour customer has a switch 6500 with 2 FWSM modules .i need to ask about the following :-can i configure the two modules for failover although the two modules in the same chassis or not ???????- Is the FWSM support VPN or not???regardsmohamed

Hi,Please let me know whether anybody has configured single NAC appliance to function in both Inband and Outband simultaneously.I Have one NAC appliance. I want this to function in inband mode for wireless users and outband for wired users.please tel...

We use our ASA as a VPN concentrator and I am seeing a ton of messages that readDeny IP spoof from (0.0.0.1) to 10.x.2.91 on interface UntrustedDMZThe 10.x.x.x address is a user on the vpn logged in from a hotel. he tells me that he only has outlook...

Hello,I'm quit new to these boards so I'll try to explain my problem as best as I can.If something is missing or incorrect pls inform me so I can update.I want to do a local NAT before a VPN IPSEC because my internal range is allready know at the cus...

hello, on a PIx 515when i try to apply the upgrade procedure i have this message :Received 2193408 bytesCisco Secure PIX Firewall admin loader (3.0) #0: Tue May 21 08:26:10 PDT 2002Flash=i28F640J5 @ 0x300BIOS Flash=AT29C257 @ 0xd8000An internal asser...

hlecalon by Level 1
  • 628 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Since we have updated our domain controller to 2003 AD...we are not able to authenticate testing on the VPN 3005...the error it gives is KBR5KBR_ERR_TOO_BIG...which means that certain users who belong to alot of groups are causing the UDP packet to b...