I have two questions about EIGRP behavior when we have Multiple EIGRP routes:
1- I tried to show on some router the acquired EIGRP paths for a route X.X.X.X by typing the command : "show ip eigrp topology X.X.X.X". On the output there were two paths one is the successor and the other is a route that did not fill the conditions to be a feasible successor but it was shown in the output of the above exact command any way.
So I checked again with the command "show ip eigrp topology | section X.X.X.X" and it showed me only one successor --> everything is fine until now.
Now I did the same two commands on its neighbor and it gave me only one route for both commands.
My question is simple ; when can I see the routes that does not fill the feasible successor condition and when I cannot ?
2 - The second question : Let's imagine that we have two routes for the IP X.X.X.X one coming from a redistribution from another Protocol (having a lower Adminsitrative Distance than EIGRP ) to EIGRP, and one is a lower FD external EIGRP route received from a simple EIGRP neighbor. The IP routing table is preferring of course the route using the other Protocol because it has lower Admin Distance (the redistribution is in the same router we are on), but in the topology table the successor is the locally redistributed route even it has lower FD.
My question is : does EIGRP prefer the local advertised EIGRP routes (reported distance = 0) even if it has higher FD ? or is this behavior caused by something else ?
Hi. Sorry for my English I have this problemI have this switch: WS-C2960G-24TC-L (c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-55.SE.bin) I am injecting multicast traffic to interface giga0/19, but it does not come out through the interface Port-cha...
Hello: Have a situation where we're trying to do some NAT'ing with an RV160-K9-NA, using only the LAN ports; there is no connection to the Internet via the WAN port. The setup: We have an interface device (a Schneider Electric ST65...
Can someone please point me to the right direction as to why my tunnel is not coming up?My configuration looks like this:explicit-path name PATH1index 1 next-address ipv4 unicast 172.16.0.4index 2 next-address ipv4 unicast 172.16.0.7index 3 next-address i...
I'm new to the firewall world. I have a firepower 1010 using the Fire Power Management Device (22.214.171.124-13) for a home lab. I created two subinterfaces and configure OSPF but one of them is not able to communicate. They both have the same configuration but...