05-20-2004 08:05 AM - edited 03-02-2019 03:50 PM
The below design started as a star but SW3
was added to SW2 because Switch 1 only had
2 fiber ports.
I need to add another switch and my options
are:
I either add another switch on top of SW1 with
fiber ports, of which none of the copper ports
are used. And add my new switch to the other
side
Or Add 5 directly to 3.
Will adding 5 to 3 work or do I need to
look at an alternative?
All the Switches are connected via fiber and
All Hubs and switches are populated with computers.
I'm concerned that adding SW5 to SW3 will
violate the 5-4-3 rule. Does it?
(Switch 1 is the main switch)
Hub1--->|SWITCH1|<---Switch4
Hub2--->|_______|<---Switch2<--Switch3(<--SW5?)
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
05-20-2004 09:04 AM
If you have an issue with the switches not having enough fiber ports just buy a fiber optic transceiver.
05-20-2004 09:24 AM
Would using a fiber transceiver connected to a RJ45 port be the same as connecting Switch to Switch via the Switch fiber port or would there be a decrease in performance?
Also, I really just want to know if it is OK to connect 5 to 3 or should I go back to 1? (I'm talking about @5 connections on 5)
Thanks.
05-20-2004 09:47 AM
You're not violating the 5-4-3 rule by add switch 5 to switch 3 because the switches negate the rule. Here's a good URL outlining this:
http://www.tencorp.com/SALESTIP.NSF/0/5b465b14bfaee6c985256c52006e36a2?OpenDocument
I would connect switch5 closest to where the traffic from the hosts on switch5 is going. E.g. if most traffic is going from switch5 to servers on switch3, connect switch5 to switch3, etc...
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide