02-21-2011 10:39 AM - edited 03-03-2019 06:12 AM
I am trying to create redundant cores, the problem I am having is with my VOIP routers. I would like to have each router physically connected to each core while having only 1 IP address. My testing will be to alternately shutdown 1 core switch at a time.
So far, the only thing I can think of doing is a bridge-group on the Ethernet interfaces, but nothing else comes to mind. Any help on thinking of an alternant solution would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Robert
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-21-2011 11:00 AM
I had a customer ask me this same question at the Cisco Live design clinic a couple years ago. After hashing through other possibilities, we decided that the bridge-group configuration is the way to go. Then you can put your one IP address on the BVI interface.
02-21-2011 11:00 AM
I had a customer ask me this same question at the Cisco Live design clinic a couple years ago. After hashing through other possibilities, we decided that the bridge-group configuration is the way to go. Then you can put your one IP address on the BVI interface.
02-21-2011 08:22 PM
Thanks for your input; it was the best I could come up with too. Not to say there is anything wrong with doing bridge-group if thats the only way. I was just hoping there was some new Cisco advancement that could do a better job then an 18 year old command.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide