03-07-2013 02:54 AM - edited 03-01-2019 02:38 PM
Hello everyone
I am using the folloing configuration on Cisco ME36000X for port shaping
policy-map TEST_OUT_10MB
class class-default
shape average 10000000
policy-map TEST_IN_10MB
class class-default
police 10000000
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
switchport mode trunk
load-interval 30
service instance 101 ethernet
encapsulation untagged
service-policy input TEST_IN_10MB
service-policy output TEST_OUT_10MB
bridge-domain 101
interface Vlan101
bandwidth 10000
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.252
I have applyed also the same port shaping on an Cisco 7609-S with an 7600-ES+20G3CXL
policy-map TEST_10MB
class class-default
police 10000000
shape average 10000000
interface GigabitEthernet1/11
bandwidth 10000
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.252
load-interval 30
service-policy input TEST_10MB
service-policy output TEST_10MB
When i am downloading a file and capturing the traffic with wireshark there is significant difference on Cisco 7609-S graph with that one on Cisco ME3600X. Both have the same internet connection.
Is there any way to fine tune Cisco ME3600X to have the same behavior like Cisco 7609-S?
Regards
Antonis.
03-08-2013 02:09 AM
Any ideas?
03-11-2013 01:19 PM
I have not that graph so I am just guessing that you are noticing the difference between policing and shaping. It seems to me you are applying these techniques on each platform on a different way. Try to shape/police in the same order or only to shape.
Hope to help
Alessio
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide