cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1653
Views
0
Helpful
7
Replies

RV110W - Access Rules

jeffschneider1
Level 1
Level 1

Have 2 rules to allow all traffic to 2 specific IP addresses.

Below that, rule to BLock all SIP traffic.

When I enaable the Block SIP rule, it blocks the 2 specific IP addresses (SIP) also.

Thought the rules applied in top down order?

7 Replies 7

jeffrrod
Level 4
Level 4

Dear Jeff,

Thank you for reaching Small Business Support Community.

The order in which access rules are displayed in the access rules table indicates the order in which the rules are applied, so yes, the rules must be applied top to down as long as the status shows "active".  Please double check on the "allow" access rule. and if that is not the problem please attach a screenshot of the access rules table.

Something else to look at is if there are any logs about the access rules, so please enable "log" on both access rules and copy the logs output to check that out, notice that enabling logging may generate a significant volume of log messages and is recommended for debugging purposes only, so turn it off after you capture some logs.

What firmware release version are you running? So, that I can look for bugs.

I'll be looking forward to hear from you.

Kind regards,

Jeffrey Rodriguez S. .:|:.:|:.
Cisco Customer Support Engineer

*Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

Jeffrey Rodriguez S. .:|:.:|:. Cisco Customer Support Engineer *Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

Jeffrey,

Firmware is  1.2.0.9

Jeff

Same problem with last firmware

jeffschneider1
Level 1
Level 1

Jeffrey,

The rules:


Always allow

All Traffic

Enabled

Inbound (WAN > LAN)

SIP Trunk IP#1

SIP Server

Always


Always allow

All Traffic

Enabled

Inbound (WAN > LAN)

SIP Trunk IP#2

SIP Server

Always


Always block

Voice(SIP)

Enabled

Inbound (WAN > LAN)

Any

SIP Server

Always

Once Rule 3 is Enabled, all SIP traffic  including IP#1 and IP#2 are blocked.  The server does not get the  requests and the log shows DENY for the IP addresses.

Jeff

Hello Jeff,

My name is Chris from the Cisco Small Business Support Center.

From what I am seeing it looks like the rules you have should create the desired effect.

What if you tried it the other way around?

Since all traffic from WAN to LAN is blocked by default anyway, try using just an inbound rule to allow the SIP traffic.

So you would have a rule for each SIP Trunk IP that looks like this:

Always allow  -   Voice(SIP)  - Enabled -  Inbound (WAN>LAN)  -   SIP Trunk IP#1/2  -    SIP Server  -   Always

and then the implicit deny all WAN>LAN inbound traffic would just take care of the rest.

Give that a try and let me know how it goes.

Christopher Ebert

---

Network Support Engineer - Cisco Small Business Support Center

Chris,

Thanks for the help but having no rule is how the sip traffic was hacked.  We have other outside ips into this router without a rule to allow so i'm not sure block is the default.

jeff

shieldedge
Level 1
Level 1

We have an RV215W that does the same thing.  I have enabled the logs and it does NOT log the allow, only the deny.  I have double checked to make sure the logging on the allow rule is selected.  It seems to be something to do with the way the rules are applied like maybe all deny rules are processed first, then the allows.