04-28-2019 03:34 PM
I bought the RV345 Dual WAN product from Cisco specifically to serve an environment where we took security and address allocation seriously. Unfortunately, I've found that the RV345 is limited to only 100 static DHCP address assignments! Why on earth would this be the case? Seems like a totally arbitrary number and it just made this product useless to me.
Can anyone from Cisco comment on this? Is there any hope of increasing this to a full class C at least.? There is no way this is a "resource limitation" of the device given the hardware components used... this is a simple software configuration.
04-28-2019 05:42 PM
Hi @rxm ,
Maybe this discussion can give you some help:
https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/rv325/m-p/3842053#M313591
Regards
04-27-2020 01:39 PM
Has there been any update to the 100 limit on the RV345?
Both DHCP static device list and IP Source Guard have a 100 device limit.
I originally posted about it here
but also found references to other users in these threads
Had been told by Cisco in 2018 that they would be updating the device limit as the old RV42G supported well over 200 IPs (or had no limit) but I have heard nothing.
03-06-2023 12:53 PM - edited 03-06-2023 01:00 PM
Unfortunately, CISCO doesn't give a s.h.i.t about the client, nothing has changed
Then there's the limit of 100 DHCP clients... which is some kind of joke from this $^#&$## CISCO company until now I saw this company as serious and this is a joke
05-24-2023 12:06 PM
Have you adjusted the dhcp range and parameters to support more than 100 clients? Every router I've ever touched can do .2-.254 on a class C.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide