cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1142
Views
0
Helpful
10
Replies

ASR 1000 memory issue

mze
Level 1
Level 1

An issue on one of our ASR 1000  where it seemed to have run out of memory

10 Replies 10

 ...

balaji.bandi
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

what Code running adding to other post look below bug also :

 

https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvg65632

BB

***** Rate All Helpful Responses *****

How to Ask The Cisco Community for Help

thanks

Leo Laohoo
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

What firmware is the router running on? 

What is the uptime of this router?

Post the complete output to the following commands: 

sh platform resource
sh platform software status control-processor brief

@mze wrote:
Mar 11 12:10:11.501 GMT: %PMAN-3-PROCHOLDDOWN: F0: pman.sh:  The process cpp_cdm_svr has been helddown (rc 137)
Mar 11 12:10:11.923 GMT: %PMAN-3-PROCHOLDDOWN: F0: pman.sh:  The process cpp_ha_top_level_server has been helddown (rc 69)
Mar 11 12:10:12.348 GMT: %PMAN-0-PROCFAILCRIT: F0: pvp.sh:  A critical process cpp_cdm_svr has failed (rc 137)

I think you are hitting multiple bugs. 

The ones above look like CSCun09640 or CSCvn97744. 


@mze wrote:
Mar 11 12:10:12.516 GMT: %CPPDRV-3-LOCKDOWN: F0: cpp_cp:  QFP0.0 CPP Driver LOCKDOWN encountered due to previous fatal error (SW: Userspace fault).
Mar 11 12:10:12.559 GMT: %CPPOSLIB-3-ERROR_NOTIFY: F0: cpp_cp:  cpp_cp encountered an error -Traceback= 1#2f78e9d02b9eba8cf2488d63bb15a429   errmsg:C23B000+2230 cpp_common_os:C90B000+C670 cpp_common_os:C90B000+C470 cpp_common_os:C90B000+19DAC cpp_rrm_svr_lib:E790000+8BE8 cpp_rrm_svr_lib:E790000+81EC cpp_rrm_svr_lib:E790000+5240 cpp_rrm_svr_lib:E790000+4200 cpp_common_os:C90B000+115E4 cpp_common_os:C90B000+11C1C evlib:C613000+E1FC evlib:C613000+105E4 cpp_common_os:C90B000+1338C :10000000+4AB0 c:943C000+1E938 c:94
Mar 11 12:10:13.283 GMT: %CPPDRV-3-LOCKDOWN: F0: fman_fp_image:  QFP0.0 CPP Driver LOCKDOWN encountered due to previous fatal error (SW: Userspace fault).

These, however, look more like CSCvf80163 than CSCvt68268. 

thanks for reply 


@mze wrote:
Memory (kB)
 Slot  Status    Total     Used (Pct)     Free (Pct) Committed (Pct)
  RP0 Healthy  3874484  3342964 (86%)   531520 (14%)   2915096 (75%)
 ESP0 Healthy   969068   962520 (99%)     6548 ( 1%)    875892 (90%)
 SIP0 Healthy   471812   378464 (80%)    93348 (20%)    355000 (75%)

Whao!  Those do not look good.  

The way I see it the ESP0 is dragging everyone down.  

Can I see the "first page" of the output to the following commands: 

  • sh process memory platform sort location F0
  • sh process memory platform sort location R0
  • sh process memory platform sort location RP
  • sh process memory platform sort location FP

thanks

Contact Cisco TAC.  I get them to verify those Bug IDs we've highlighted above.

thanks will do 

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card