06-01-2012 07:43 AM - edited 03-04-2019 04:32 PM
Hi to all,
I explain my question. at the moment I have a 888 router that works fine, I want to configure backup (I already have configure ISDN backup but the performance it's to poor), and I want to use an other router 887 (that I already have) with adsl.
My idea is to configure the second router as stand alone gateway, and confiure in the first router a "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 VLAN1 192.168.0.253 100".
But I know that this second route is used only in case the interface status of primary route goes down but not in case fault only protocol.
Do you have any idea to configure a better routing or faulting procedure?
-----------------------------------
888
VLAN1 192.168.0.254
ATM0.1 1.1.1.1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ATM0.1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 VLAN1 192.168.0.253 100
-----------------------------------
887
VLAN1 192.168.0.253
ATM0.1 2.2.2.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ATM0.1
-----------------------------------
Ciao
Augusto.
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-01-2012 07:56 AM
PBR, default route tracking or a dynamic routing protocol would be your best options in my opinion.
06-01-2012 07:56 AM
PBR, default route tracking or a dynamic routing protocol would be your best options in my opinion.
06-01-2012 09:05 AM
Thank a lot in lab test with route tracking work great! I hope it works also in customer production...
I follow thi thread https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/174255
Thank a lot
Augusto
06-01-2012 09:03 AM
If the goal is to provide redundancy for the client's default gateway, then use HSRP or VRRP on both routers. Configure tracking on the primary router so that HSRP/VRRP IP moves to the secondary router when the tracked object is down/unreachable.
If these are upstream routers (not client gateways), then as KWillacey says, use default route tracking and a dynamic routing protocol.
Regards,
Paul
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: