12-22-2011 05:06 AM - edited 03-04-2019 02:43 PM
Hello all,
I have a c890 witch is a default gateway for the lan behind it.
The router is configured with bgp for 2 providers and local network is /24 routable network (92.224.1.0/24).
I think bgp is configured corectly because I can ping any ip from the router (92.224.1.1), for example I can ping 8.8.8.8.
The problem is that I can not ping anything from the local network, from example I can not ping 8.8.8.8 (google dns) from 92.224.1.2.
92.224.1.2 has as default gw 92.224.1.1.
92.224.1.2 -> 92.224.1.1 -> BGP 2 ISP's
Thanks.
12-22-2011 05:27 AM
Hi,
can you post output from following on the router:
-sh ip route
-sh ip bgp
Regards.
Alain
12-22-2011 05:38 AM
sure,
sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is 89.xxx.xxx.121 to network 0.0.0.0
B* 0.0.0.0/0 [20/0] via 89.xxx.xxx.121, 00:39:14
89.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 89.xxx.xxx.120/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet8
L 89.xxx.xxx.122/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet8
92.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 92.224.1.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0
L 92.224.1.1/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0
sh ip bgp
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 0.0.0.0 89.xxx.xxx.121 0 0 6xx3 i
I've pulled out one isp.
12-22-2011 06:59 AM
Hi,
you didn't advertise your 92.224.1/24 network into BGP so this network is not reachable from outside on any other AS.
just advertise it either with a network command or redistribute it.
router bgp xxx
network 92.224.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
or
router bgp xxx
redistribute connected route-map 92_Prefix
ip prefix-list myprefix permit 92.224.1.0/24
route-map 92_Prefix
match ip address prefix-list myprefix
Regards.
Alain.
12-22-2011 08:36 AM
I have the network command in my config. I just spoked with my isp and they told me that they can not see any advertise from my ip (89.xxx.xxx.122).
My bgp config. I've deleted the second isp for testing.
I don't have any acl configured on the router.
router bgp 5xxx1
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 92.224.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
neighbor 89.xxx.xxx.121 remote-as 6xx3
neighbor 89.xxx.xxx.121 ebgp-multihop 3
neighbor 89.xxx.xxx.121 next-hop-self
no auto-summary
Thanks.
12-22-2011 09:00 AM
HI mate...
please issue the comand "Show ip bgp neigh 89.xxx.xxx advertised-routes." and paste the output here please...
have you cleared the bgp table after you added the network statement ? if not.. issue clear ip bgp * soft
cheers
12-22-2011 09:22 AM
Hello, the result is 0.
show ip bgp neighbors 89.xxx.xxx.121 advertised-routes
Total number of prefixes 0
Yes, I've cleared the bgp table.
12-22-2011 09:28 AM
YOu probably have a conflict in your routing table... IF its not properly installed in the routing table, BGP wont propagate anything...
i know the prefix is directly connected as seen in your routing table...
but if you issue the command show ip route 92.224.1.0 , what u see ?
12-22-2011 09:48 AM
What can I do ?
sh ip rou 92.224.1.0
Routing entry for 92.224.1.0/24
Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface)
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* directly connected, via GigabitEthernet0
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
12-22-2011 10:00 AM
remove the network for that subnet and add the one for loopback to see if you can propagate your loopback... if not.. i would reboot your router
btw... you can remove this command
neighbor 89.xxx.xxx.121 next-hop-self
as you are dealing with an EBGP connection the next hop will always change to your router`s address when it advertises learned prefixes and locally originated ones, thus you dont really need it.
12-22-2011 07:15 PM
Provide output of show ip bgp neighbor
show " show ip bgp neigshow ip
---
Posted by WebUser Chetan Mahendroo
12-23-2011 09:58 AM
Sorry for the late response.
I will try next year with loopback, what Gustavo says.
Until then bgp is down.
Is strange, because on linux with quaga bgp was working well but here (Cisco C892) does not work. I'm sure I have missed something.
Until next year I whish you all a Happy New Year!
... and thanks for the support.
12-23-2011 10:23 AM
alright... let us know how it goes...
01-02-2012 11:27 PM
Hello, I just tried with the network configured on loopback and all it's working fine
I still don't understand why the network configured on a fa port can't be advertised but on loopback is working.
Anyway, thank you all for the support.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide