06-17-2015 12:29 AM - edited 03-05-2019 01:41 AM
Hi there, hoping someone can help with a question i have regarding BGP network statements.
If I have a remote site with the following networks:
192.168.120.0/24
192.168.121.0/24
192.168.122.0/24
192.168.123.0/24
192.168.124.0/24
192.168.125.0/24
192.168.126.0/24
192.168.127.0/24
This can be summarized for static routing as 192.168.120.0/21
Is it possible to reduce the number of network statements in the BGP configuration to something similar, or do I have to include each actual class C network in the BGP configuration.
ie
router bgp 5501
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 192.168.120.0
network 192.168.121.0
etc
Thanks for any help with this! :-)
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-17-2015 05:29 AM
Hello Nick,
the following example shows a conditional aggregation (at least one more specific route within the specified range has to be in the BGP table):
router bgp 5501
network 192.168.120.0
[network 192.168.121.0]
[network ...]
aggregate-address 192.168.120.0 255.255.248.0 summary-only
Another (unconditional) method would be a static discard-route for the summary and one matching network- or redistribution statement under the BGP process:
ip route 192.168.120.0 255.255.248.0 null 0
router bgp 5501
network 192.168.120.0 mask 255.255.248.0
(Note that the masks of static route and network statement need to match!)
HTH
Rolf
[Basically what Joseph has already stated while I was typing ...]
06-17-2015 05:29 AM
Hello Nick,
the following example shows a conditional aggregation (at least one more specific route within the specified range has to be in the BGP table):
router bgp 5501
network 192.168.120.0
[network 192.168.121.0]
[network ...]
aggregate-address 192.168.120.0 255.255.248.0 summary-only
Another (unconditional) method would be a static discard-route for the summary and one matching network- or redistribution statement under the BGP process:
ip route 192.168.120.0 255.255.248.0 null 0
router bgp 5501
network 192.168.120.0 mask 255.255.248.0
(Note that the masks of static route and network statement need to match!)
HTH
Rolf
[Basically what Joseph has already stated while I was typing ...]
06-17-2015 10:27 PM
Thanks guys, that's great. I have now successfully implemented both examples in my GNS3 environment, Rolf thanks for going the extra mile with config examples im very new to BGP and this is invaluable. Much appreciated!
12-01-2019 09:14 PM
regarding the use of 'aggregate-address'; does this summarize the advertisements TO BGP peers? Or does it summarize the advertisements received FROM peers?
Also, is it possible to summarize for advertisements to specific BGP neighbors?
06-17-2015 07:43 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Yes, it's possible to summarize within BGP. You do not need to include a network statement for each /24.
You also can inject the summary into BGP alone, or you can pick up each active /24 within the summary range.
Instead of actually picking of the prefixes dynamically, often a null route will be used for the whole address block and a network statement used for that.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: