07-29-2013 01:35 PM - last edited on 03-25-2019 03:39 PM by ciscomoderator
Hello,
I am hoping to get some advice regarding BGP and route-map configuration that we have on our MPLS router. This config was implemented before my arrival and it has me somewhat confused. We are advertising many networks out of our main office, even though the only networks that reside here are 10.10.x.x and 10.100.x.x. The network commands have a route-map attached to them and I am not quite sure what this acheives. Below are my config snippets. I want to remove these excess network statements from BGP as I think they are creating routing loops within BGP.
BGP Config
router bgp XXXXX
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 10.10.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0
network 10.20.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 route-map NoStatic
network 10.30.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 route-map NoStatic
network 10.40.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 route-map NoStatic
network 10.50.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 route-map NoStatic
network 10.60.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 route-map NoStatic
network 10.80.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 route-map NoSt atic
network 10.90.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 route-map NoStatic
network 10.100.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0
aggregate-address 10.100.0.0 255.255.0.0 summary-only
neighbor 10.254.100.2 remote-as 64663
neighbor 10.254.100.2 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor 10.254.100.2 prefix-list harwood-out-tw out
Route-map Config
route-map NoStatic deny 10
match tag 30 40 50 60 80 90 100
!
route-map NoStatic permit 20
Tagging Config
ip route 10.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.250.20.2 250 tag 100 name BACKUP_ROUTE_GRE_HOUSTON
ip route 10.30.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.250.30.2 250 tag 30 name BACKUP_ROUTE_GRE_AUSTIN
ip route 10.40.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.250.40.2 250 tag 40 name BACKUP_ROUTE_GRE_FORTWORTH
ip route 10.50.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.250.50.2 250 tag 50 name BACKUP_ROUTE_GRE_WASHINGTON_DC
ip route 10.60.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.250.60.2 250 tag 60 name BACKUP_ROUTE_GRE_SANANTONIO
ip route 10.80.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.250.80.2 250 tag 80 name BACKUP_ROUTE_GRE_CHARLOTTE
ip route 10.90.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.250.90.2 250 tag 90 name BACKUP_ROUTE_GRE_WOODLANDS
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-30-2013 12:15 PM
Sounds like redundancy has been built in somehow. Are there any macros, seem scrips, or ip SLA configured?
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
07-29-2013 03:30 PM
Hi David,
I guess the use for route-map is not advertise the routes if it is tagged with the number. But I am not sure if BGP looks tag. Do a show ip bgp 10.20.0.0, see if the router advertises the route in BGP table.
HTH,
Lei Tian
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
07-30-2013 06:19 AM
So this is the weird thing, and the reason I want to get rid of these network commands. When everything is up and running normally, my router is only advertising two routes, 10.10.x.x and 10.100.x.x. See Info below. However, if one of my sites loses MPLS connectivity, lets say 10.50.x.x, then that route will then start advertising out of this site. So the below output would then have 10.50.0.0/16. Does that make sense?
Router> show ip bgp nei 10.254.100.2 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 2376, local router ID is 10.250.90.10
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, x best-external, f RT-Filter
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 10.10.0.0/16 10.100.87.5 257024 32768 i
*> 10.100.0.0/16 10.100.87.5 257024 32768 i
07-30-2013 06:51 PM
Hi David,
So I guess the static routes are floating routes with AD 250, and the router learns those routes from other routing protocol in normal siatuation. I am wondering why is the router not advertising those routes in that case. Can you post the output of show ip route 10.20.0.0 from the router, and the full config for BGP section?
HTH,
Lei Tian
07-30-2013 12:15 PM
Sounds like redundancy has been built in somehow. Are there any macros, seem scrips, or ip SLA configured?
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
07-30-2013 02:13 PM
Agreed john. Let us see full run config.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
07-31-2013 06:10 AM
I think I have it figured out. We have a backup VPN that connects a remote site (lets call it Site A) to the main office (Site B). The reason the remote site networks are advertised from the main office is so Site C can access Site A through Site B when the backup VPN is up.
Thanks for taking time to respond.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide