07-30-2020 12:04 AM
Hi everyone,
I just got a hold of a new C1111 router, and I was just wondering is there a particular reason that you can only put routed interfaces (Gi0/0/0 and Gi0/0/1) as members of port-channel or am I doing something wrong here ??? If that's the only option, I guess the idea behind this is just to create redundancy or increase bandwidth on an UPLINK. I would like to create port-channel towards my LAN network, but there is no option to put channel-group command on switched interfaces (Gi0/1/0 - Gi0/1/3).
Thanks you for your response
07-30-2020 05:22 AM
Hello @Learning101 ,
I think it is a device limitation caused mainly by its performance it can not support to have multiple gigabit of traffic going through it.
It is an edge device.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
04-05-2021 04:59 AM
Hi Guiseppe
I think that you might be right and that might indeed be the reason, however that said, Port-channels are used for other things than just increasing traffic flow.
I think its a sad thing that Cisco does not recognize the value of this feature for the edge routers.
The Cisco 1111-4p has 2 Routing ports and a 4 port switch.
That means I can get several different options for redundancies on the external interfaces.
I would love to have the possibility to connect a Port-channel to a switch/switch stack/VPC/2nd router to get link redundancy on the inside too. (Yes spanning tree is one option, but not the one i prefer!)
The most irritating part is that the command is half there, you can do the port-channel command but you can not add the number.
The ISR4221 has the identical problem when you add a 4 port switch module to it.
If anyone at Cisco is seeing this please consider adding this properly to the switch modules, it would help a lot with fault tolerance designs.
Best Regards
Torbjorn
09-16-2021 01:17 AM
I have solved this limitation by moving UPLINKS to switched ports, and used routed ports (where i can create Port-channel) towards the LAN network where I have stacked switches.
09-22-2022 01:16 AM
I have the Same issue,
Could you please share the configuration of the Etherchannel with the routed-ports.
Thanks
09-22-2022 01:53 AM
could you inform me how did you configure vpc on this router ? i tried to configure it with the same way as nexus switch to add vpc 1 under interface port-channel 1.20
12-09-2022 12:15 AM
Sorry for a late reply, this is how I did it:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
description Po10
no ip address
negotiation auto
channel-group 10 mode active
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
description Po10
no ip address
negotiation auto
channel-group 10 mode active
!
interface Port-channel10
description LAN
no ip address
no negotiation auto
service instance 2 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 2
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
bridge-domain 2
!
service instance 7 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 7
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
bridge-domain 7
!
interface BDI2
description SERVICE-1
ip address x.y.z.q
!
interface BDI7
description SERVICE-2
ip address x.y.z.q
!
05-08-2023 01:52 PM
Hello, wouldn't it be easier just use sub-interfaces on router-on-a-stick?
interface Port-channel10
no ip address
!
interface Port-channel10.10
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address x.x.x.x
!
interface Port-channel10.20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address y.y.y.y
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
no ip address
channel-group 10 mode active
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
no ip address
channel-group 10 mode active
07-08-2022 04:26 PM
chiming in and completely agree on this point, this is a disappointing limitation given the router's market position - port-channel has far more\greater utility than simply aggregating bandwidth, some would argue its other benefits are what many deployments would be looking for.
09-22-2022 05:37 AM
I own one of the C1111-4P routers. When the router was released, there was no support for Etherchannel. I think with one of the updates they added the feature but I have not tested it. I would not be surprised if is very limited.
12-08-2022 11:30 AM
(Gi0/1/0 - Gi0/1/3) are switchports, you cannot do port channel on C1111 router
12-08-2022 12:35 PM
This needs to be analyzed again. At the time of the writing and the image that I had, there were no options for EtherChannel for those interfaces. But in the 17.0 XE version there are options for that on those interfaces. I have not tested that, but I will and write back.
12-09-2022 12:09 AM
I have a router in my office with latest recommended version 17.6.3a and it still does not support channel-group on switch interfaces (Gi0/1/0-Gi0/1/3).
12-10-2022 09:25 AM
You are correct. But in IOS 16 I did see those options.
12-10-2022 02:12 PM
Port channel is possible on gi 0/0/0 and gi 0/0/1 2 routed ports. If One port goes to ISP, then we cannot do port channel.
(Gi0/1/0 - Gi0/1/3) are switchports.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide