ā08-31-2020 06:02 AM
I try to configure PAT on the Cisco1941 when using source inside (LAN), I found loss 7%. However, from source outside (WAN) have no loss. The CPU is just 1%. How should I do? Is there any NAT limitation on Cisco1941?
Thank you very much.
ā08-31-2020 06:58 AM
Hello,
what do you mean with 7% loss ? Are you losing PING (ICMP) packets ? Post the running configuration of your 1941 router.
ā08-31-2020 10:44 AM
Hello
Not enough information to understand your issue?
What wan connection do you have (mpls-lre-ppp etc..)
What routing protocols if any are you using
What NAT are you using ( domain (inside/outside) or domainless
Are you implementing any QOS?
Have you tired a test from a host within your network instead of the rtrs lan interface?
ā09-01-2020 07:18 AM
Configuration:
What wan connection do you have (mpls-lre-ppp etc..)
MPLS L2VPN to the Service Provider
What routing protocols if any are you using
Just default route to the Internet
What NAT are you using ( domain (inside/outside) or domainless
Can see in the configuration
Are you implementing any QOS?
Nope
Have you tired a test from a host within your network instead of the rtrs lan interface?
Same result
Thank you very much.
ā09-01-2020 07:36 AM
Hello,
is there a specific reason for the 'per-packet' load sharing ? That alone could be your issue. Change that to the default 'per-destination' load balancing.
Also, if you use static routes, are we talking about two static default routes ? Post the output of 'show ip route'.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide