Different queueing strategy in ima-group

[t-hata]

Hi,

We have 4 T1 circuits which are bundled into ATM/IMA group.

However, I found the guy set first two interfaces have weighted fair as the Queueing strategy, and last two have Per VC Queueing.

I think the grouped interfaces should have same queueing strategy, but I wonder what kind of problems will occur under my circumstance?

Does anyone have an idea?

[mohindersingh]

Hi Buddy,

I think you should be checking the queuing stratergy on the IMA interface not on physical interfaces.

if you have applied policy-map with CBWFQ on the IMA interface, it should be reflected on IMA interface, not on physical.

Regards

Mahi

[t-hata]

Hi Mahi,

Thanks for your reply. I confirmed the IMA interface set to Per VC queueing.

But it seemed any policy-map applied to it.

Does this queueing strategy on IMA interface override the queueing strategy on each physical interface?

Regards,

Hata