04-03-2010 10:25 PM - edited 03-04-2019 08:01 AM
Hi,
i am a CCNA and 2 year experience in networks, i am preparing for CCNP cert.
I am quite frustrated for the past couple of months, i am not able to reach for a solution on my problem and i wish i could get any help from here.
ok, here we go.
we are 20+ branches with single DMVPN HUB, running WAN over IPVPN, however with our ISP it has been decided to run it over OSPF 1 process.
this is the only routing protocol running on my HUB and spoke routers,
router ospf 1
network 10.200.1.x 0.0.0.252 <-- WAN interface "fa0/1"
network 1.1.1.x 0.0.0.0 <-- Tunnel interface "tun1"
network 10.1.100.x 0.0.0.255 <-- LAN interface "fa0/0"
deep inside me i know that the above is wrong, as this is distributing as well the local lan to the ISP.
when i show ip route, i can see all our LAN for 20+ sites are showing through our ISP WAN IP Address.
this is wrong, as i've learnt by reading more about DMVPN routes has to be learnt from tunnel interfaces.
i've tried to have another OSPF process but i was not succeeding, i've also tried EIGRP but with another failure.
if more details is still required, please ask me.
i want to have an ideal network infrastructure in my organization, as i am working on a redunduncy plan and i want to solve this before i implement the backup solution.
thanks in advance.
AA
more over, i've spent
04-03-2010 10:45 PM
You don't advertise the WAN subnet over OSPF if the tunnel source is the WAN interface. That would create loop and the DMVPN tunnel would not be up. In the show ip route, you should be seeing all the remote LAN through the tunnel interface instead of through WAN if the DMVPN tunnel is UP.
Here is a sample configuration for your reference:
04-03-2010 10:51 PM
thanks for the quick reply however i am not able to open the link
The file or application you are trying to access may require additional entitlement or you are trying to access a file with an invalid name. Additional entitlement levels are granted based on a users relationship with Cisco on a per-application basis.
04-03-2010 10:54 PM
04-03-2010 10:56 PM
still the same
The file or application you are trying to access may require additional entitlement or you are trying to access a file with an invalid name. Additional entitlement levels are granted based on a users relationship with Cisco on a per-application basis.
04-03-2010 10:59 PM
Try to open the URL on a different browser. Sometimes, it gave that error message somehow. It gives me the same error when i use firefox, but it opens OK in IE.
04-03-2010 11:16 PM
tried, but still same.
04-04-2010 04:36 PM
04-04-2010 06:34 PM
thank you Edison,
however, after reviewing the document and after going through halijenn's comments there is somthing i have to say,
i have to publish WAN interface on ospf 1 because this is configured along with ISP otherwise the cloud wont perform.
howcome i should not publish it on ospf? what are alternatives?
i've tried having another ospf on one of spokes as well as the hub putting only LAN and tunnel interfaces, but ospf was not working for a reason.
regards,
04-05-2010 01:39 AM
ok from the above discussion i understand that you need to have full reachablity between your hub and remote sites using WAN addressing only
this is done using ospf 1
and in the network command use only the network and the subnet between each router and the ISP ( to get advertised by the ISP to other sites)
for LAN communications you need configure another ospf process
advertise in this ospf the tunnel network and the LAN in each site
in the tunnel configuration of on each remote site you will map the multicast and the tunnel ip of the hub to the WAN ip address of the hub router
( the WAN IP address of the hub and all other sites will be reachable via the ospf process 1 through the ISP )
once the tunnel up between the remote site and the hub the new added ospf process will be established and the routing between the LANs will be over the tunnel
make sure you have all the tunnels including the hub to be cofigure with ospf network type as broadcast
and the priority in each tunnel interface of the remote sites only to be set to 0 to make sure the hub will be the DR
you could refer to the bellow document as well for more details about configuring the routing protocols over the DMVPN
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8356
good luck
if helpful Rate
04-05-2010 04:14 AM
hi marwan,
thanks for your help, however when i tried the same as i mentioned before, something goes wrong.
below is how i did the config
interface Tunnel15
ip address LAN/24
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip mtu 1416
ip nhrp authentication key
ip nhrp map HUB-Tunnel IP HUB-WAN IP
ip nhrp map multicast HUB-WAN IP
ip nhrp network-id 11
ip nhrp holdtime 600
ip nhrp nhs HUB-Tunnel IP
ip nhrp nhs
ip ospf priority 0
tunnel source FastEthernet0/1
tunnel mode gre multipoint
tunnel key 11
tunnel protection ipsec profile myprofile
router ospf 1 <-- ISP routing process
network ISP WAN/30 area 0
router ospf 2 <-- process added by me
network LAN/24 area 0
network Tunnel/32 area 0
same additional OSPF process added on hub.
but OSPF is not starting, i cant see routes initiated on the new ospf process.
04-05-2010 04:30 AM
first
what you mean in the tunnel IP LAN/24
let say your LAN interface ip 10.1.1.10/24
and tunnel interface ip is 20.1.1.10
Spok:
tunnel 0
ip add 20.1.1.10 255.255.255.0
ip ospf network broadcast
ip ospf priority 0
router ospf 2
network 10.1.1.10 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 20.1.1.10 0.0.0.0 area 0
Hub:
LAN 100.1.1.1/24
tunnel 20.1.1.1/24
tunnel 0
ip add 20.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip ospf network broadcast
ip ospf priority 100
router ospf 2
network 100.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 20.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
i am assuming your DMVPN tunnel is up
use show ip nhrp
show crypto ipsec profile
if its still not working please post your config here (one spoke and the hub )
good luck
07-07-2010 08:42 PM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide