02-22-2016 07:27 AM - edited 03-05-2019 03:24 AM
I was reading other similar posts (https://supportforums.cisco.
02-22-2016 01:43 PM
In a private conversation I have talked with Juan about the need for router A to have a single crypto map with two instances, one for B and one for C. We also talked about the problem of using permit ip any any in the crypto access list. I believe that he is now in better shape in his config for the IPsec tunnel part. There is also some L2TPv3 in the config which is not my area of expertise. If anyone has input about that part please speak up.
HTH
Rick
02-24-2016 04:51 AM
Thanks Richard!
I have an ipsec tunnel working between A and B. I wanted to try this first. However I have an L2TP issue because I need to connect a subnet in a Switch connected with Router A with the same subnet in another Switch connected with router B. I know it could be solve using l2tp-class, pseudowire and xconnect. But I have two questions:
1. Is there any other way to solve this issue?
2. When trying to solve my original problem with routers A, B and C which changes I will have to make to have the 2 tunnels working?
Richard told L2TP is not his expertise area. Can somebody help?
Thanks!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide