04-23-2018 07:09 AM - edited 03-05-2019 10:19 AM
Hi there
problem should be simple to resolve. However, i could not succeed. I have a FlexVPN setup with hub & spoke design. I had to change the configuration from a nonVRF Design into a fullVRF (all interfaces belong to a vrf) design. Since then, the default route is not advertised to spoke routers anymore. Here are some outputs:
roRZ201#show ip interface brief Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol GigabitEthernet0/0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up Gi0/0/0.300 172.27.1.9 YES TFTP up up GigabitEthernet0/0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down GigabitEthernet0/0/2 unassigned YES NVRAM up up Gi0/0/2.11 unassigned YES unset up up GigabitEthernet0/0/3 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down GigabitEthernet0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down Dialer1 212.25.66.107 YES IPCP up up Loopback2 172.19.0.1 YES manual up up Virtual-Access1 unassigned YES unset up up Virtual-Access2 unassigned YES manual up up Virtual-Access5 172.19.0.1 YES unset up up Virtual-Template2 172.19.0.1 YES unset up down
roRZ201#show ip eigrp vrf LAN neighbors
EIGRP-IPv4 VR(LAN) Address-Family Neighbors for AS(1)
VRF(LAN)
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 172.19.0.66 Vi5 14 00:39:34 35 1398 0 36
roRZ201#show ip eigrp vrf LAN topology
EIGRP-IPv4 VR(LAN) Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(172.27.1.9)
Topology(base) TID(0) VRF(LAN)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 172.19.0.1/32, 0 successors, FD is Infinity
via 172.19.0.66 (13107200000/9830400000), Virtual-Access5
P 172.19.0.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 163840
via Connected, Loopback2
P 172.16.220.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 9831055360, tag is 20
via 172.19.0.66 (9831055360/1310720), Virtual-Access5
P 172.19.0.66/32, 1 successors, FD is 9830400000
via Rstatic (9830400000/0)
P 172.27.1.0/28, 1 successors, FD is 1310720
via Connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/0.300
roRZ201#show running-config | include ip rout
ip route vrf LAN 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.27.1.1
ip route vrf LAN 172.16.0.0 255.240.0.0 172.27.1.1
roRZ201#show ip route vrf LAN | begin Gate
Gateway of last resort is 172.27.1.1 to network 0.0.0.0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 172.27.1.1
S 172.16.0.0/12 [1/0] via 172.27.1.1
172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 172.16.220.0 [90/76805120] via 172.19.0.66, 00:11:22, Virtual-Access5
172.19.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
C 172.19.0.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback2
L 172.19.0.1/32 is directly connected, Loopback2
S 172.19.0.66/32 is directly connected, Virtual-Access5
172.27.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 172.27.1.0/28 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/0.300
L 172.27.1.9/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/0.300
roRZ201#show running-config | begin eigrp
router eigrp LAN
!
address-family ipv4 unicast vrf LAN autonomous-system 1
!
topology base
redistribute static
exit-af-topology
network 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255
exit-address-family
I tried a whole class B range (as all our devices reside within) as well, but it didnt help. On the spoke side:
roTST01#show ip eigrp vrf LAN topology EIGRP-IPv4 VR(LAN) Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(172.16.220.3) Topology(base) TID(0) VRF(LAN) Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply, r - reply Status, s - sia Status P 172.19.0.1/32, 1 successors, FD is 9830400000 via Rstatic (9830400000/0) P 172.19.0.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 9830481920 via 172.19.0.1 (9830481920/163840), Tunnel2 P 172.16.220.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 1310720, tag is 20 via Connected, Vlan10 P 172.19.0.66/32, 1 successors, FD is 9830400000, tag is 20 via Connected, Tunnel2 P 172.27.1.0/28, 1 successors, FD is 9831055360 via 172.19.0.1 (9831055360/1310720), Tunnel2 roTST01#show ip route vrf LAN | begin Gate Gateway of last resort is not set 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 172.16.220.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10 L 172.16.220.3/32 is directly connected, Vlan10 172.19.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks D 172.19.0.0/24 [90/76800640] via 172.19.0.1, 00:12:32 S 172.19.0.1/32 is directly connected, Tunnel2 C 172.19.0.66/32 is directly connected, Tunnel2 172.27.0.0/28 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 172.27.1.0 [90/76805120] via 172.19.0.1, 00:12:32
The thing is, it worked before is VRF'ed the hub router. But in my understanding i did everything correct. I hope someone else is spotting my mistake quickly. If you need more output, pls advise.
Help is much appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-23-2018 07:19 AM
OK i just found this post:
https://www.netcraftsmen.com/using-vrf-lite-eigrp-and-static-routes/
It explains that you have to set a metric when redistributing static routes while using vrf's. As soon as i added a metric, the networks came up immediately.
04-23-2018 07:19 AM
OK i just found this post:
https://www.netcraftsmen.com/using-vrf-lite-eigrp-and-static-routes/
It explains that you have to set a metric when redistributing static routes while using vrf's. As soon as i added a metric, the networks came up immediately.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: