04-23-2018 07:09 AM - edited 03-05-2019 10:19 AM
Hi there
problem should be simple to resolve. However, i could not succeed. I have a FlexVPN setup with hub & spoke design. I had to change the configuration from a nonVRF Design into a fullVRF (all interfaces belong to a vrf) design. Since then, the default route is not advertised to spoke routers anymore. Here are some outputs:
roRZ201#show ip interface brief Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol GigabitEthernet0/0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up Gi0/0/0.300 172.27.1.9 YES TFTP up up GigabitEthernet0/0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down GigabitEthernet0/0/2 unassigned YES NVRAM up up Gi0/0/2.11 unassigned YES unset up up GigabitEthernet0/0/3 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down GigabitEthernet0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down Dialer1 212.25.66.107 YES IPCP up up Loopback2 172.19.0.1 YES manual up up Virtual-Access1 unassigned YES unset up up Virtual-Access2 unassigned YES manual up up Virtual-Access5 172.19.0.1 YES unset up up Virtual-Template2 172.19.0.1 YES unset up down
roRZ201#show ip eigrp vrf LAN neighbors
EIGRP-IPv4 VR(LAN) Address-Family Neighbors for AS(1)
VRF(LAN)
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 172.19.0.66 Vi5 14 00:39:34 35 1398 0 36
roRZ201#show ip eigrp vrf LAN topology
EIGRP-IPv4 VR(LAN) Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(172.27.1.9)
Topology(base) TID(0) VRF(LAN)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 172.19.0.1/32, 0 successors, FD is Infinity
via 172.19.0.66 (13107200000/9830400000), Virtual-Access5
P 172.19.0.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 163840
via Connected, Loopback2
P 172.16.220.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 9831055360, tag is 20
via 172.19.0.66 (9831055360/1310720), Virtual-Access5
P 172.19.0.66/32, 1 successors, FD is 9830400000
via Rstatic (9830400000/0)
P 172.27.1.0/28, 1 successors, FD is 1310720
via Connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/0.300
roRZ201#show running-config | include ip rout
ip route vrf LAN 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.27.1.1
ip route vrf LAN 172.16.0.0 255.240.0.0 172.27.1.1
roRZ201#show ip route vrf LAN | begin Gate
Gateway of last resort is 172.27.1.1 to network 0.0.0.0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 172.27.1.1
S 172.16.0.0/12 [1/0] via 172.27.1.1
172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 172.16.220.0 [90/76805120] via 172.19.0.66, 00:11:22, Virtual-Access5
172.19.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
C 172.19.0.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback2
L 172.19.0.1/32 is directly connected, Loopback2
S 172.19.0.66/32 is directly connected, Virtual-Access5
172.27.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 172.27.1.0/28 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/0.300
L 172.27.1.9/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/0.300
roRZ201#show running-config | begin eigrp
router eigrp LAN
!
address-family ipv4 unicast vrf LAN autonomous-system 1
!
topology base
redistribute static
exit-af-topology
network 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255
exit-address-family
I tried a whole class B range (as all our devices reside within) as well, but it didnt help. On the spoke side:
roTST01#show ip eigrp vrf LAN topology EIGRP-IPv4 VR(LAN) Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(172.16.220.3) Topology(base) TID(0) VRF(LAN) Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply, r - reply Status, s - sia Status P 172.19.0.1/32, 1 successors, FD is 9830400000 via Rstatic (9830400000/0) P 172.19.0.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 9830481920 via 172.19.0.1 (9830481920/163840), Tunnel2 P 172.16.220.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 1310720, tag is 20 via Connected, Vlan10 P 172.19.0.66/32, 1 successors, FD is 9830400000, tag is 20 via Connected, Tunnel2 P 172.27.1.0/28, 1 successors, FD is 9831055360 via 172.19.0.1 (9831055360/1310720), Tunnel2 roTST01#show ip route vrf LAN | begin Gate Gateway of last resort is not set 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 172.16.220.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10 L 172.16.220.3/32 is directly connected, Vlan10 172.19.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks D 172.19.0.0/24 [90/76800640] via 172.19.0.1, 00:12:32 S 172.19.0.1/32 is directly connected, Tunnel2 C 172.19.0.66/32 is directly connected, Tunnel2 172.27.0.0/28 is subnetted, 1 subnets D 172.27.1.0 [90/76805120] via 172.19.0.1, 00:12:32
The thing is, it worked before is VRF'ed the hub router. But in my understanding i did everything correct. I hope someone else is spotting my mistake quickly. If you need more output, pls advise.
Help is much appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-23-2018 07:19 AM
OK i just found this post:
https://www.netcraftsmen.com/using-vrf-lite-eigrp-and-static-routes/
It explains that you have to set a metric when redistributing static routes while using vrf's. As soon as i added a metric, the networks came up immediately.
04-23-2018 07:19 AM
OK i just found this post:
https://www.netcraftsmen.com/using-vrf-lite-eigrp-and-static-routes/
It explains that you have to set a metric when redistributing static routes while using vrf's. As soon as i added a metric, the networks came up immediately.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide