06-20-2014 12:50 AM - edited 03-04-2019 11:11 PM
Hi
We are facing the issue with EIGRP flapping..
when we checked the interface the bandwidth utilization is going more than alloted bandwidth.. But no one is transvering the traffice...
We configured IPSec for packet encapsulation. Once neighbour ship came tunnel is going down... and frequently EIGRP is flapping . i dont think flapping is due to Bandwidth.. I need to fix the issue. Any experience please provide the steps to trouble shoot.
in log i am observing these two message frequently. Could u help me on this?
% CRYPTO-4-RECVD_PKT_INV_SPI:decaps:rec'd IPSEC Packet had valid spi for destaddr=<local ipaddress>,prot=50, spi=0XEB0A5D3A(3943324986),srcaddr=<remote ip address>. input interface=Gigabithethernet1/0/0
% CRYPTO-4-IKMP_NO_SA: IKE Message from <Remote ip address> had no SA and is not an initialization offer
%DUAL_5-NBR-CHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 AS: Neigbor WAN IP < gi1/0/0> is down: PEER -Termination received
DUAL_5-NBR-CHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 AS: Neigbor WAN IP < gi1/0/0> is up:new adjacency
06-20-2014 01:45 AM
Hi Dineshkumar
Not much to go on but it looks like the tunnel is connecting at phase 1 (isakmp) but failing in phase 2 (ipsec)
% CRYPTO-4-IKMP_NO_SA: IKE Message from <Remote ip address> had no SA and is not an initialization offer
I think above suggests that your ipsec parameters don't match.
Check config on both sides to make sure the transform set is the same.
If your still stuck please post the following
show crypto isakmp sa
show crypto ipsec sa
sho run | s crypto
Good luck
06-20-2014 02:26 AM
i can share the Show Crypto Isakmp Sa on local router.
Ipv4 crypto ISAKMP SA
dst src state conn-id Status
local interface address Remote location 1 interface address QM_IDLE 38040 ACTIVE
ocal interface address Remote location 2 interface address QM_IDLE 38037 ACTIVE
RL Sec int address local interface address QM_IDLE 38041 ACTIVE
RLsec int address- Remote location secondary router interface address.
Due EIGRP flapping i am not able to login other router. checked with remote engineer transform set was same on both site.
06-20-2014 03:43 AM
Hi D,
The output above confirms that phase 1 isakmp has completed successfully. So just need to double check what your doing for phase 2.
Its difficult if you cant see both sides but best to set up a phone call to check and agree the following ipsec settings with the other guy:
Encryption - esp-des, esp-3des or esp-aes?
Hashing - are you using esp-md5-hmac or esp-sha-hmac?
Group - Have you set a diffie hellman group - if so what have you got? 1, 2, 5?
Lifetime - not so important but best to agree on
Once you are sure you are in agreement check your config paying attention to your transform set:
crypto ipsec transform-set mytset esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec profile whateverUcalledIT
set security-association lifetime seconds 86400
set transform-set mytset
Make sure you are referencing the correct tranform set - especially important if you have configured more than one.
Let us know how you get on.
06-20-2014 03:56 AM
Sorry also to add the transform set name is only locally important - so you can both use whatever name you want. Important to make sure you reference it correctly in your own config:
crypto ipsec transform-set mytset esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec profile whateverUcalledIT
set security-association lifetime seconds 86400
set transform-set mytset
Cheers for now
06-20-2014 04:19 AM
everything was fine.. But we not configured set security-association lifetime seconds 86400 on device..
06-20-2014 04:35 AM
Is it all working now?
06-20-2014 05:25 AM
its working fine now.. But the issue we disconnected one of the device the local lan and now the link is working fine.. But i dont know why eigrp flapping occur and Ipsec error message received.. Eventhough as per my understanding router will forward broadcast packets..
We are using two separate tunnel for production and T&D..
06-20-2014 05:51 AM
Hi D
I guess you are using eigrp to advertise the T&D network, and the Tunnel interface IP range
Is it possible that you are also including the ip range of the tunnel destination in the same eigrp instance?
06-20-2014 04:27 AM
Hi D
You can reuse the transform set but I believe its best practice to use separate ones.
Just to get things straight - what is the output from: show crypto ipsec sa
Is the tunnel up?
Also I'm a little confused are you connecting 2 separate vpn tunnels between CPC & DC.
CPC======VPN1 Production Tunnel=====DC
CPC======VPN2 T&D Tunnel=========DC
Cheers
06-20-2014 03:58 AM
Hi Robert.
We have 3 Location.
CPC, DC, DR
Each location we have 2 Routers for Primary and Secondary for Production link
One router for DC for T& D link
in CPC unit T&D terminated in Primary production router.
Encryption - esp-aes on all three location for production and T&D Link
Hashing - using esp-md5-hmac for production and T&D Link
Group - using 2.
Only one doubt i have
in CPC we are same router so created production link set transform-Set trans2
T&D Link at CPC set transform-set trans1
but in DR & DC production interface we used transform-set trans1
in T&D link at DC used transform-Set trans1 on T&D Router
did this is issue . But we did this confifiguration nearly 1 Year before. we not faced the problem previous.. I need explanation for that command only.. I am much familiar in ipsec troubleshooting..
06-20-2014 02:33 AM
Hi robert.
Did this is the issue? but it was working fine from intial configiguartion.. why now its creating problem..
One of the location
set transform-set trans2
but other 2 location
Set transform-set trans1
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide