cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
918
Views
0
Helpful
8
Replies

Gateway of Last resort is set but traceroute comes back request timed out

jaggallagher
Level 1
Level 1

I am trying to configure failover with a gateway of last resort. I have 2 routers and each have there own ISP connection. One is our primary, and the other is our backup that also routes all of our wireless traffic. We have route-maps setup on the core switches to segment the 2 routes. The fail over from router 1 to router 2 works because there is no route-maps. So to get around that I have made router 2's gateway of last resort router 1. When i turn off router 2 outside facing interface the gateway of last resort changes to the connection to router 1 but the traceroute from the computer shows request timed out.

8 Replies 8

Hi

If the traffic is going from R2 to R1 and you are receiving request time out, it could be:

- Have you configured the R1's interface as NAT inside?  

- Have you verified if R1's is meeting the PC LAN through R2 or through other way.

- If you are using BGP on these routers have you configured next hop self? (Not really sure if you are using BGP hehe)

 

Hope it is useful

:-)




>> Marcar como útil o contestado, si la respuesta resolvió la duda, esto ayuda a futuras consultas de otros miembros de la comunidad. <<

Router 1 Conf

 

interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description Link to RT-2
ip address 172.22.253.1 255.255.255.252
no ip proxy-arp
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
ip ospf cost 3
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
no mop enabled
!

 

Router 2 Conf

interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description Link to RT-1
ip address 172.22.253.2 255.255.255.252
no ip proxy-arp
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
ip ospf cost 3
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
no mop enabled
!

 

We are using EIGRP for dynamic routing. 

When performing traceroute from a PC it goes from our core to router 2 and then when it should go to router 1 the request just times out. 

 

 

 

 

Hi,

Thank you, could you please verify how R1 is knowing the PC network, if it is through R2 or if R1 has an entry into the routing table.

 




>> Marcar como útil o contestado, si la respuesta resolvió la duda, esto ayuda a futuras consultas de otros miembros de la comunidad. <<

R1 has its own entry on the routing table of the PC Network.

Great, is it via R2?




>> Marcar como útil o contestado, si la respuesta resolvió la duda, esto ayuda a futuras consultas de otros miembros de la comunidad. <<

Im sorry i should have made that more clear. No R1 has its own entry in the routing table for PC network from the core switch. The topology is as follows. 2 routers each with there own separate ISP, then each router is connected to a ASA, and then both the ASA connect into the core switch. So each router gets the route for the PC Network directly from the switch.  

Hi

Got it, so it is:                     R1 ---- ISP1

                                        / 

CORE ------------ ASA 

                                        \

                                          R2 ---- IPS2

 

Is that correct? do you have a ASA cluster?




>> Marcar como útil o contestado, si la respuesta resolvió la duda, esto ayuda a futuras consultas de otros miembros de la comunidad. <<

         

                 RT 1   --------- ISP1

                /

          ASA

         /

Core

         \

           ASA

                 \

                  RT 2   --------- ISP1

The ASA are not in cluster they cant see each other. They are on different network segments. This is how the network was setup before I was hired so working with it. 

 

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card