05-02-2013 12:30 PM - edited 03-04-2019 07:47 PM
We have a point to point GRE tunnel which has some issues that I would like to see if I can get some guidance. When clients connect to the WLAN and are routed thru this tunnel they experience latency on some https applications. However if you change the MTU on the laptops 802.11 radio from 1500 over to 1476 the problem disappears. What is the best approach to change this without changing it on every machine.
Traffic Flow is as follows:
Client --> LWAPP --> (TUNNELED) --> WLAN Controller --> VLAN INTERFACE --> TUNNEL <<WAN>> TUNNEL --> <<INTERNET>>
05-02-2013 01:01 PM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
If your WLCs support it, enable mss adjust, globally.
If your WAN GRE tunnels support it, set IP MTU to 1476, mss adjust to 1436 and enable tunnel PMTUD.
05-03-2013 04:52 AM
The bytes added by GRE result in a frame that sometimes is larger than the permitted MTU. I have found that frequently using the command ip tcp adjust-mss is an effective way to avoid the problem of fragmenting traffic that is going through GRE. I generally apply it on the LAN interface but I have seen some people apply it on the tunnel interface.
HTH
Rick
05-03-2013 05:44 AM
Hello
In regards to Joesph and Richard comments
int tun xx
ip mtu 1476
ip tcp adjust-mss 1436
res
Paul
05-03-2013 06:33 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
And to add to Paul's actual tunnel interface configuration statements . . .
tunnel path-mtu-discovery
05-03-2013 07:15 AM
One last question.... can I do the following :
interface vlan xxx
ip mtu 1476
ip tcp adjust-mss 1436
interface tunnel xx
tunnel path-mtu-discovery
I would rather change it on the VLAN interface before it hits the tunnel.
05-03-2013 08:41 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
You might be able to do that, but for different reasons, you want to apply to the tunnel interfaces.
Regarding your question about whether needed on both ends, MTU and PMUD yes, adjust-mss actually no, but normally you place it on both ends too. (Adjust-mss applies to traffic in both directions.)
05-03-2013 07:37 AM
hello
i would apply it on the tunnel if thats where your traffic is traversing
res
paul
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
05-03-2013 07:40 AM
Can I assume we need these on both ends of the tunnel ?
05-03-2013 08:34 AM
hello
yes apply both ends
res
paul
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
05-03-2013 08:45 AM
@ Joseph
wasnt aware of that -
cheers
paul
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide