07-23-2012 08:05 AM - edited 03-04-2019 05:02 PM
Hi,
We have two 100 MBPS P2P link from two different ISP and we have terminated both the link on our 6509 switch. Now we want to configure the load balancing between these two disfferent ISP 100 MBPS P2P link.
So, how to go and what all options we can try ? We are thinking for Ether Channel configuration. Need your expert opinions on the same and if etherchannel configuration is the option then what would be the configuration for the same ?
Regards,
TB
07-23-2012 08:12 AM
Hello Tuhin,
use two routed L3 links with /30 IP subnets and you will get flow based CEF load balancing (ECMP equal cost multi path)
For etherchannel to work both links have to be terminated on the same device on the remote end.
In case using LACP is recommended ( channel-group N mode active) in this way LACP control frames travel on all member links checking their health status
Hope to help
Giuseppe
07-23-2012 08:22 AM
Hi,
Thanks for your information.
FYI, both the linkn has been terminated on the same device only at remote end only as we are managing the remote end as well. Also, it is completely a L2 path.
So, we have hard coded 100 MBPS full duplex both end for both the ISP and when we put those ISP link on trunk at a time it is working fine abd so far we are able to spna all our VLAN from our side to remote end.
Now waht we want is to bundle both the link so that we can get 200 mbps pipe and as well as load balancing should happen.
Kindly, let me know if you need any further information from my side.
Regards,
TB
07-23-2012 08:44 AM
Hello Tuhin,
if the service is L2 and you want to extend your Vlans over it you need a L2 etherchannel.configured as a trunk
First of all, member links need to be configured in the same way for speed, duplex, trunk encapsulation, native vlan. list of vlan permitted on trunk
interface gix/y
switchport
switchpot trunk enc dot1q
swichport mode trunk
speed 100
duplex full
!
interface gik/h
switchport
switchpot trunk enc dot1q
swichport mode trunk
speed 100
duplex full
!
At this point you can configure the aggregate on your side using
interface gix/y
channel-group 5 mode active
interface gik/h
channel-group 5 mode active
Do the same on both ends, channel-group number don't need to match, it has to be an unused group check with
show etherchannel summary
what bundles exist in your system
Hope to help
Giuseppe
07-23-2012 08:25 AM
If you need real load balancing implement PFR,
otherwise for load sharing the guys already told you how...
Take Care
Alessio
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide