Hi
I tested this on 2951 running 15.1(4)M1 code - it gives me the parser error when I execute the command although the command is accepted.
h323cucm8#sh ver | i .bin
System image file is "flash:c2951-universalk9_npe-mz.SPA.151-4.M1.bin"
h323cucm8#sh ver | i 29
Cisco IOS Software, C2951 Software (C2951-UNIVERSALK9_NPE-M), Version 15.1(4)M1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
h323cucm8 uptime is 1 hour, 29 minutes
System image file is "flash:c2951-universalk9_npe-mz.SPA.151-4.M1.bin"
Cisco CISCO2951/K9 (revision 1.1) with 479232K/45056K bytes of memory.
*0 CISCO2951/K9 xxxxxxxxxxx
Technology Package License Information for Module:'c2951'
h323cucm8#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
h323cucm8(config)#route-map test deny 10
h323cucm8(config-route-map)#match ip add prefix-list test1 ?
WORD IP prefix-list name
h323cucm8(config-route-map)#match ip add prefix-list test1 ! test2
% Ambiguous command: "match ip add prefix-list test1 ! test2" >>>>>>>>>>>>>
h323cucm8(config-route-map)#do sh run | sec route-map test
route-map test deny 10
match ip address prefix-list test1 ! test2
Then I tested following -
Router1 -------------- Router2
Router1 :
ip route 11.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
ip route 22.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0/1.1
!
ip prefix-list test1 seq 5 permit 22.0.0.0/24
!
route-map test permit 10
match ip address prefix-list test1 ! test2
router eigrp 1
redistribute static metric 1 1 1 1 1 route-map test
network 155.1.146.1 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
Router2 :
router eigrp 1
network 155.1.146.4 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
and on R2 I could see the all the static routes getting redistributed -
sh ip eigrp topo
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(150.1.4.4)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 155.1.146.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281600
via Connected, FastEthernet0/1
P 11.0.0.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
via 155.1.146.1 (2560025856/2560000256), FastEthernet0/1
P 22.0.0.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
via 155.1.146.1 (2560025856/2560000256), FastEthernet0/1
and if I modify the route-map statement on Router1 as -
route-map test permit 10
match ip address prefix-list test1
Then on R2 -
sh ip eigrp topo
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(150.1.4.4)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 155.1.146.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281600
via Connected, FastEthernet0/1
P 22.0.0.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
via 155.1.146.1 (2560025856/2560000256), FastEthernet0/1
If you are specifying multiple prefix-lists in route-map then it takes it as LOGICAL OR.
I tried to define, if it's possible to crate a prefix-list with the "!" as it's name -
h323cucm8(config)#ip prefix-list ?
WORD Name of a prefix list
sequence-number Include/exclude sequence numbers in NVGEN
h323cucm8(config)#ip prefix-list ! ?
WORD Name of a prefix list
sequence-number Include/exclude sequence numbers in NVGEN
h323cucm8(config)#ip prefix-list ! ?
WORD Name of a prefix list
sequence-number Include/exclude sequence numbers in NVGEN
h323cucm8(config)#ip prefix-list ! test1 ?
WORD Name of a prefix list
sequence-number Include/exclude sequence numbers in NVGEN
h323cucm8(config)#ip prefix-list ! test1 permit 10.0.0.0/24
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
I don't know if the behavior will vary based on the IOS used, but if IOS is throwing the parser error - then I would not use it, instead I will prefer using something like this -
h323cucm8(config)#route-map test permit 10
h323cucm8(config-route-map)#description Global subnets
h323cucm8(config-route-map)#match ip address prefix-list test1
Also I have not seen any sh command giving the outputs including the comments (starting with !)
- HTH
Rahul
