06-07-2013 12:55 PM - edited 03-04-2019 08:08 PM
Hello ,
we are receiving complaints from office lan users regarding slowness in accessing applications at remote site on 20M mpls link ,we configured top talkers and got the below ouput when the user complained about slowness.we see the traffic is destined to tunnel0 is consuming most of the bandwidth but there are no tunnels configured on the router ,can someone explain is it legitimate traffic or virus ?
KAL3626-WAN1#sh ip flow top-talkers
SrcIf SrcIPaddress DstIf DstIPaddress Pr SrcP DstP Bytes
Gi0/2 10.70.2.16 Tu0 10.18.0.19 06 01BD D2E4 30M
SM1/0 10.70.2.16 Gi0/0.347* 10.18.0.19 06 01BD D2E4 7828K
Gi0/2 10.70.2.16 Tu0 10.40.134.14 06 01BD F01B 3771K
Gi0/2 10.70.2.16 Tu0 10.40.130.51 06 01BD D435 3552K
SM1/0 10.18.0.19 Gi0/2* 10.70.2.16 06 D2E4 01BD 2960K
Gi0/2 10.70.2.16 Tu0 10.40.134.10 06 01BD CCE2 1685K
SM1/0 10.40.130.51 Gi0/2* 10.70.2.16 06 D435 01BD 1459K
SM1/0 10.40.134.14 Gi0/2* 10.70.2.16 06 F01B 01BD 1226K
SM1/0 10.40.134.10 Gi0/2* 10.70.2.16 06 CCE2 01BD 1175K
Gi0/0.347 10.18.0.19 Tu2 10.70.2.16 06 D2E4 01BD 896K
10 of 10 top talkers shown. 566 flows processed.
AGS3626-WAN1#sh run int gi0/2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 186 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description LAN ROUTING
ip address 10.254.252.145 255.255.255.248
ip wccp 61 redirect in
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
duplex auto
speed auto
end
Em0/0 admin down down
Gi0/0 up up ATT MPLS Circuit ID
Gi0/0.347 up up
Gi0/1 admin down down
Gi0/2 up up LAN ROUTING
SM1/0 up up
SM1/1 up up Internal switch interface connected to Service Module
Tu0 up up
Tu1 up up
Tu2 up up
Vl1 up up
KAL3626-WAN1#sh run int Tu0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5 bytes
end
KAL3626-WAN1#sh run int Tu1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5 bytes
end
KAL3626-WAN1#sh run int Tu2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5 bytes
end
KAL3626-WAN1#sh ip int br
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Embedded-Service-Engine0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
GigabitEthernet0/0.347 10.250.250.49 YES NVRAM up up
GigabitEthernet0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/2 10.254.252.145 YES NVRAM up up
SM1/0 10.254.251.145 YES NVRAM up up
SM1/1 unassigned YES unset up up
Tunnel0 172.16.0.1 YES unset up up
Tunnel1 172.16.0.1 YES unset up up
Tunnel2 172.16.0.1 YES unset up up
Vlan1 unassigned YES unset up up
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-07-2013 01:44 PM
It is not a virus. I see in the configuration that you have enabled WCCP. And the tunnels that show up in your show ip interface brief are created by WCCP to redirect the traffic. It is fairly predictable that WCCP redirection through the tunnel would show up as top talker, since it is taking traffic from multiple sources and redirecting it through the tunnels.
We do not have enough information to be able to say how much WCCP is addiing to the latency. But that is something that you might want to take a look at.
HTH
Rick
06-07-2013 01:44 PM
It is not a virus. I see in the configuration that you have enabled WCCP. And the tunnels that show up in your show ip interface brief are created by WCCP to redirect the traffic. It is fairly predictable that WCCP redirection through the tunnel would show up as top talker, since it is taking traffic from multiple sources and redirecting it through the tunnels.
We do not have enough information to be able to say how much WCCP is addiing to the latency. But that is something that you might want to take a look at.
HTH
Rick
06-07-2013 02:26 PM
Thanks Rick.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide