cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
478
Views
5
Helpful
5
Replies

Local Route showed in routing table, however not configured

jbaros
Beginner
Beginner

Hello Team,

I have here curious case, I am seeing local routes in my routing table which is not configured on my router. See below:

Spoiler
L 10.51.38.129/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/2.950
L 10.51.38.150/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/2.950
L 10.51.38.151/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/2.950
L 10.51.38.152/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/2.950
L 10.51.38.153/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/2.950
L 10.51.38.154/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/2.950
L 10.51.38.155/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/2.950
L 10.51.38.157/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/2.950

But my interface is configured by another IP:

Spoiler
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2.950
description --- admin to switch
encapsulation dot1Q 950
ip address 10.51.46.94 255.255.255.224 secondary
ip address 10.51.38.129 255.255.255.224
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
end

Why there are such Local routes in my table? I would like to use them for switches management, however this not working until it is in routing table as L. ARP is showing that 10.51.38.150 has same MAC as router. I have tried restart interface, reconfigure, clear IP table.

How can I remove my not existing Local routes?

Thanks a  lot.

 

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

jbaros
Beginner
Beginner

Thank You for your answers, I have fixed it - by workaround. I have moved admin interface to redundant router, and now on new router it is working good, I dont see any non-existing IP addresses in my routing table.

But I didnt find out what caused the issue

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5

MHM Cisco World
VIP Mentor VIP Mentor
VIP Mentor

there is issue with NAT I think 
can you share the config of NAT you use?

Hello MHM,

I am not using NAT, but good point.

 

Spoiler

 

router1439#sh ip nat stat
Total active translations: 0 (0 static, 0 dynamic; 0 extended)
Outside interfaces:
Inside interfaces:
Hits: 1298166 Misses: 836454
Expired translations: 836312
Dynamic mappings:
nat-limit statistics:
max entry: max allowed 0, used 0, missed 0
In-to-out drops: 0 Out-to-in drops: 0
Pool stats drop: 0 Mapping stats drop: 0
Port block alloc fail: 0
IP alias add fail: 0
Limit entry add fail: 0
router1439#show ip nat translation
Total number of translations: 0

I also did check if those IP is configured, but not.

Spoiler
router1439#sh run | inc 10.51.38.150
router1439#

I will run lab and check, just for info.
first 
you have hsrp run between two core ??
and there is no nat ? confirmed
and the proxy arp is disable ? please confirm 
and there is no dhcp exclude for these IP in any router ? please confirm 

Hello MHM,

Here are my replies:

you have hsrp run between two core ?? - NO for subinterface 950, for other sub interfaces I use HSRP
and the

proxy arp 

is disable ? - YES,

no ip proxy-arp 

on each interface including subinterfaces
and there is no dhcp exclude for these IP in any router ? NO DHCP for 10.51.38.128/27 at all, this is static range

Thank you for your checks.

jbaros
Beginner
Beginner

Thank You for your answers, I have fixed it - by workaround. I have moved admin interface to redundant router, and now on new router it is working good, I dont see any non-existing IP addresses in my routing table.

But I didnt find out what caused the issue

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Recognize Your Peers