11-12-2013 10:38 AM - edited 03-04-2019 09:33 PM
We are migrating a remote site's router from a 2811 to an ISR 3925. One of the commands on the WAN interface of the 2811 (which happened to be a FastEthernet interface, as we have an ethernet service from our ISP) will not take on the new 3900 - running IOS 15.2(4)M5.
The max-reserved-bandwidth command does not seem to exist on the GigabitEthernet interfaces. Since we have voice traffic running over this interface, we need to ensure the QoS is working appropriately. Does the bandwidth qos-reference command take the place of the max-reserved-bandwidth option?
Thanks!
11-12-2013 01:10 PM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
The max-reserved-bandwidth became, I believe, obsolete with HQF (12.4[20]T). 15.x may have dropped it.
11-14-2013 12:00 PM
Thank you Joseph! After some additional discussion, I don't believe that the lack of this command will hurt us, but do you know if there is an equivalent in 15.X?
11-14-2013 12:49 PM
Hi Aweise,
I am not sure about this just wanted to share if it can help refring to your question:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/legacy_qos_cli_deprecation.html
Hope it helps.
Regards
Please rate if it helps.
11-14-2013 01:14 PM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
No, I don't know of a replacement. Lack of it shouldn't hurt, although you may want to insure all your classes have a defined bandwidth allocation.
PS:
Sandeep's posting tells us the commands have been deprecated.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide