ā07-29-2023 10:30 PM - edited ā07-29-2023 10:49 PM
Hi Everyone,
I badly need help.
am working on mGRE (static). I am able to get the tunnel up. However, I could not get LAN side networks on both sides to go through the tunnel as EIGRP does not seem to work. It is not forming any neighbor relationship. I have been dealing with this for few days already. Here is the code below:
PLEASE HELP
TOPOLOGY:
!////////////////////////////////////////////// !/////////////////////// R1 /////////////// !////////////////////////////////////////////// R1# R1#show run Building configuration... version 15.6 ! hostname R1 ! redundancy ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Tunnel1 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ip nhrp map 192.168.1.2 199.1.1.2 ip nhrp map 192.168.1.3 75.1.1.3 ip nhrp map 192.168.1.4 200.1.1.4 ip nhrp network-id 1 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel mode gre multipoint ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 150.5.5.1 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto media-type rj45 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto media-type rj45 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 150.5.5.5 ! ! end R1#ā
!///////////////////////////////////////////////////// !/////////////////////// R2 (SPOKE)/////////////////// !///////////////////////////////////////////////////// R2# R2#show run Building configuration... ! hostname R2 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 ! interface Tunnel1 ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ip nhrp map 192.168.1.1 150.5.5.1 ip nhrp map 192.168.1.3 75.1.1.3 ip nhrp map 192.168.1.4 200.1.1.4 ip nhrp network-id 1 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel mode gre multipoint ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 199.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto media-type rj45 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip address 172.16.2.2 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto media-type rj45 ! ! router eigrp 100 network 10.0.0.0 network 192.168.1.0 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 199.1.1.5 end
Thank you.
x- makinaā
Solved! Go to Solution.
ā07-30-2023 04:16 AM
Hello,
In addition to the other friends' responses here, at the first sight, you are missing the multicast NHRP mappings in your configurations. As you know, EIGRP is a combined multicast/unicast beast, and it needs both types of connectivity to work. Your mappings allow the unicast connectivity, but when EIGRP puts a multicast packet on the Tunnel interface, the router does not know whom to send a copy of that multicast packet.
If you are doing this configuration statically (which, however, defeats the purpose of the Dynamic Multipoint VPN), then the hub needs to have a multicast mapping for every spoke while a spoke needs the multicast mapping only and exclusively for the hub. So something like this:
!!! On the R1 as the hub, add:
interface Tunnel1
ip nhrp map multicast 199.1.1.2
ip nhrp map multicast 75.1.1.3
ip nhrp map multicast 200.1.1.4
!!! On the R2 as the spoke, add:
interface Tunnel1
ip nhrp map multicast 150.5.5.1
This should help EIGRP to come up.
Best regards,
Peter
ā07-30-2023 04:52 AM - last edited on ā07-30-2023 10:12 PM by Translator
Your consider is correct' he not use phase1 nor phase2
dmvpn ( nhrp is dmvpn)
I run lab and test connect spoke to spoke and share with you result.
He can use
ip nhrp nhs
under spoke tunnel which already build static tunnel in hub and spoke and use
ip nhrp map
multicast dynamic. But let me test.
I will update you when finish lab.
ā07-30-2023 01:58 AM
Hello
Can you elaborate on what you are trying to achieve, you seem to be wanting to use DMVPN , is this correct or is it just to use a simple GRE tunnel to route eigrp traffic?
this is the case then you are missing a few command statements
ā07-30-2023 02:21 AM - last edited on ā07-30-2023 10:11 PM by Translator
Hello Paul,
Thank you for your reply.
I want to be able to for an GRE tunnels to multiple sites by assigning STATIC mapping of tunnel interfaces with public IPs(NBMA).
I use
NHRP map
command. At this point, I am not yet in DMVPN. First I want to be able to be able to use EIGRP and have my 2x LAN networks from R1
(the 10.1.1.0/24)
site and R2
(the 10.2.1.0/24)
site to communicate with each other (ping).
From what I understand, these 2x networks need to be able to use the mGRE tunnel for them to communicate.
Once these two are able to communicate, then I will continue to configure R3 and R4 sites later on.
Isnt that possible ?
Thank you so much.
ā07-30-2023 04:52 AM - last edited on ā07-30-2023 10:12 PM by Translator
Your consider is correct' he not use phase1 nor phase2
dmvpn ( nhrp is dmvpn)
I run lab and test connect spoke to spoke and share with you result.
He can use
ip nhrp nhs
under spoke tunnel which already build static tunnel in hub and spoke and use
ip nhrp map
multicast dynamic. But let me test.
I will update you when finish lab.
ā07-30-2023 02:31 AM - last edited on ā07-30-2023 10:13 PM by Translator
I will run lab test
static nhrp map
ā07-30-2023 03:20 AM
Hi MHM,
Thank you so much.
Thank you
ā07-30-2023 04:16 AM
Hello,
In addition to the other friends' responses here, at the first sight, you are missing the multicast NHRP mappings in your configurations. As you know, EIGRP is a combined multicast/unicast beast, and it needs both types of connectivity to work. Your mappings allow the unicast connectivity, but when EIGRP puts a multicast packet on the Tunnel interface, the router does not know whom to send a copy of that multicast packet.
If you are doing this configuration statically (which, however, defeats the purpose of the Dynamic Multipoint VPN), then the hub needs to have a multicast mapping for every spoke while a spoke needs the multicast mapping only and exclusively for the hub. So something like this:
!!! On the R1 as the hub, add:
interface Tunnel1
ip nhrp map multicast 199.1.1.2
ip nhrp map multicast 75.1.1.3
ip nhrp map multicast 200.1.1.4
!!! On the R2 as the spoke, add:
interface Tunnel1
ip nhrp map multicast 150.5.5.1
This should help EIGRP to come up.
Best regards,
Peter
ā07-30-2023 04:56 AM - edited ā07-30-2023 05:36 AM
Hi Sir Peter,
THANK YOU SOO MUCH !!! You're solution fixed my issue which has been giving me headache for days.
I am actually learning CCNA, specifically on VPN now so I am following a lesson. The class lesson I am studying has shown me how to create the MGRE tunnel and the tunnel interface -to-NBMA maps but it didnt show how to route internal LAN traffic and I have been trying to find an answer.
I got stuck in this lesson trying to find an answer and I refuse to move forward to the next lesson (about DMVPN) until I succeed doing this static version first, both on EVEng and on real gears.
I am guessing I will have to use the same in case I want OSPF in lieu of EIGRP. (I am a beginner in networking)
Thank you so much Sir Peter !!! Now I can sleep well
I am pretty sure others like me will find your answer here to be very helpful now and in the future.
Thank you so much Sir Peter !!!
Regards,
x-makina
ā07-30-2023 01:17 PM
Hello x-makina,
You are heartily welcome < 3
Best regards,
Peter
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide