cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
570
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies

NAT and Route map configuration

aparada14
Level 1
Level 1

I have a trouble trying to get connectivity using Nat and route-map together in a multihoming scenario.

5 Replies 5

aparada14
Level 1
Level 1

I?m seing matches in my access-list but the translation is not made. Anybody have a clue???

Here is an example of one I recently used. If you post your configuration we might see any possible errors.

ip nat pool Pool1 11.11.12.12 11.11.12.12 prefix-length 28

ip nat pool Pool2 10.10.11.11 10.10.11.11 prefix-length 28

ip nat inside source route-map MAP-1 pool Pool1 overload

ip nat inside source route-map MAP-2 pool Pool2 overload

INTERFACE VLAN2

ip nat inside

INTERFACE VLAN3

ip nat inside

interface fa0/1

ip nat outside

interface fa0/0

ip nat outside

access-list 108 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 108 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 ANY

access-list 118 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 118 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 ANY

route-map MAP-1 permit 10

match ip address 108

set default interface fa0/1

route-map MAP-2 permit 10

match ip address 118

set default interface fa0/0

Dear Sir

Can u tell the secenario and the configuration u had done

The customer has 2 T-1's going to 2 ISP's. They wanted the traffic from the 192.168.1.0/24 network to go out of the Fast0/0 interface to ISP1 and the traffic from the 192.168.2.0 network to use the Fast0/1 interface using ISP2. The traffic had to be NAT'd prior to exiting the Fast Ethernet interfaces. So this configuration did just that for them.

Can I have multiple global addresses for an internal IP in order to connect to diferent parnert network??. I mean something like:

10.0.44.50 --> 172.20.10.61 for ISP1

10.0.44.50 --> 172.20.10.64 for ISP2 and each statement associated to static nat inside source with different route-maps and access-list and have connection without problem to connect both ISPs simultaneusly